Federal contractor · MADISON, WI

SUPERIOR HEALTH QUALITY ALLIANCE INC

SUPERIOR HEALTH QUALITY ALLIANCE INC received -$47.6M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 2 awards (−152% vs FY2025). Since FY2020: $107.4M. Its largest customer was Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (-$47.6M).

Obligations · FY2026
-$47.6M
New awards
2
Sole-source
—
Single offer
—
UEI
H9DLWK3JC537
Other than small businessNonprofit

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 30.6MFY2020
  2. 948.2KFY2021
  3. 28.6MFY2022
  4. 1.6MFY2023
  5. 1.4MFY2024
  6. 91.7MFY2025
  7. -47.6MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 2 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

Largest awards

  1. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services· Dane County, WI· Health & medical· May 8, 2025 – Aug 31, 2026· 75FCMC25FJ051
  2. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services· Dane County, WI· Health & medical· May 27, 2025 – Feb 26, 2026· 75FCMC25FJ047

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $13.4M (14 subawards)

9 sub-recipients

  1. MADISON, WI · 2 subawards
  2. BIRMINGHAM, MI · 1 subaward
  3. MINNEAPOLIS, MN · 2 subawards
  4. FITCHBURG, WI · 2 subawards
  5. QSOURCE$1.1M8.2%
    MEMPHIS, TN · 1 subaward
  6. OKEMOS, MI · 1 subaward
  7. SAINT PAUL, MN · 2 subawards
  8. CHARLESTON, WV · 2 subawards
  9. NAPERVILLE, IL · 1 subaward

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $151K paid out · $600K received
  • FY2022: $3.5M paid out · $0 received
  • FY2023: $39.1M paid out · $0 received
  • FY2024: $38.7M paid out · $0 received
  • FY2025: $6M paid out · $0 received
  • FY2026: $13.4M paid out · $0 received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

12 companies · $100.9M reported

  1. FARMINGTON HILLS, MI · 5 subawards · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services
  2. MINNEAPOLIS, MN · 6 subawards · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services
  3. MADISON, WI · 6 subawards · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services

Primes that pay it

1 company · $600K reported

  1. ALBUQUERQUE, NM · 2 subawards · Scientific research and development services

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 1 market (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. NEW HAVEN, CT · 100% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveCenters for Medicare and Medicaid Services · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services
  2. COMAGINE HEALTH$43.5M−101% in FY2026
    SEATTLE, WA · 2 entities · 95% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveCenters for Medicare and Medicaid Services · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services
  3. A. REDDIX & ASSOCIATES INC.$42.8M−6.7% in FY2026
    NORFOLK, VA · 95% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveCenters for Medicare and Medicaid Services · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026.