Federal contractor · SUPERIOR, MT

SUPERIOR SEPTIC INC

SUPERIOR SEPTIC INC received $93.1K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 4 awards (+290% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $866.4K. Its largest customer was Forest Service ($93.1K).

Obligations · FY2026
$93.1K
New awards
4
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
100%
UEI
QDKHLLJVQR89
Small business
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 181.8KFY2017
  2. 130.6KFY2018
  3. 10.4KFY2019
  4. 321KFY2021
  5. 26.6KFY2022
  6. 49KFY2023
  7. 30KFY2024
  8. 23.9KFY2025
  9. 93.1KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Forest Service$93.1K100%
    4 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Equipment maintenance$76.9K83%
  2. Health & medical$16.2K17%

Where the work was performed

  1. Missoula County, MT$93.1K100%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition100%
    US 39% · $93.1K
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions100%
    US 8.7% · $93.1K
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. SUPERIOR SEPTIC INC MTLNF260296 S21$64.7K
    Forest Service· Missoula County, MT· Equipment maintenance· Jul 25, 2026 – Jul 25, 2026· 1202RZ26M0698
  2. LOLO NF WEST ZONE TOILET PUMPING CONTRACT FOR PLAINS/TFALLS, SUPERIOR, AND NINEMILE RANGER DISTRICTS$52.2K
    Forest Service· Missoula County, MT· Health & medical· Apr 12, 2023 – Jan 8, 2026· 1284LM23P0028
  3. SUPERIOR SEPTIC INC MTLNF250007 S21$13.4K
    Forest Service· Missoula County, MT· Equipment maintenance· Aug 1, 2025 – Dec 11, 2025· 1202RZ25M0643
  4. SUPERIOR SEPTIC INC MTLNF260244 S1S20$8,820
    Forest Service· Missoula County, MT· Equipment maintenance· Jul 9, 2026 – Jul 9, 2026· 1202RZ26M0584

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 1 market (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. GRAHAM CHRISTOPHER C$153.3K−36% in FY2026
    NORTH HIGHLANDS, CA · 100% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveForest Service · Remediation and other waste management services
  2. INTEGRITY SERVICE COMPANY, LLC$139.4K−35% in FY2026
    HUMBOLDT, AZ · 95% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveForest Service · Remediation and other waste management services
  3. CHASSE GREGORY D$137.5K+28% in FY2026
    NEW HAMPTON, NH · 94% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveForest Service · Remediation and other waste management services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.