Federal contractor · ANCHORAGE, AK

SUSITNA SOLUTIONS, LLC

SUSITNA SOLUTIONS, LLC received $2.9M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 4 awards (+7.9% vs FY2025). Since FY2023: $7.2M. Its largest customer was Department of the Air Force ($2.9M).

Obligations · FY2026
$2.9M
New awards
4
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
100%
UEI
CA74SARMJMA6
Small businessMinority-ownedNative-owned

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 75.7KFY2023
  2. 1.5MFY2024
  3. 2.7MFY2025
  4. 2.9MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 4 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Equipment maintenance$1.6M55%
  2. Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles$1.3M45%

Where the work was performed

  1. Abroad$2.9M100%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition100%
    US 39% · $2.9M
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · -$19.3K
  • Single-offer competitions100%
    US 8.8% · $2.9M
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. Department of the Air Force· Equipment maintenance· May 27, 2025 – Jun 1, 2026· FA862525FB006
  2. Department of the Air Force· Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles· Oct 25, 2023 – May 28, 2026· FA862524FB006
  3. Department of the Air Force· Equipment maintenance· May 11, 2026 – May 11, 2026· FA862526FB008
  4. Department of the Air Force· Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles· Mar 12, 2024 – Apr 1, 2026· FA862524FB005

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 1 market (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. E-SPECTRUM TECHNOLOGIES, INC.$7.3M−33% in FY2026
    SAN ANTONIO, TX · 100.0% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing
  2. F3 LOGISTICS LLC$8.2M−92% in FY2026
    WARNER ROBINS, GA · 100.0% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing
  3. CTE JV, LLC$5.8M−82% in FY2026
    ORLANDO, FL · 82% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026.