Federal contractor · OXNARD, CA
SYNECTIC SOLUTIONS, INC.
SYNECTIC SOLUTIONS, INC. received $19.4M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 21 awards (−19% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $159M. Its largest customer was Department of the Navy ($19.4M).
- Obligations · FY2026
- $19.4M
- New awards
- 21
- Sole-source
- 3.9%
- Single offer
- 37%
- UEI
- DLWCLM63SXM7
Spending by fiscal year
Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).
- 9.4MFY2017
- 16.6MFY2018
- 16.4MFY2019
- 15.7MFY2020
- 12.2MFY2021
- 15.2MFY2022
- 13.8MFY2023
- 16.2MFY2024
- 24MFY2025
- 19.4MFY2026
Top buying agencies
Obligations in FY2026.
- Department of the Navy$19.4M100.0%20 awards
- Missile Defense Agency$5000.0%1 awards
What was bought · Where the work was performed
Obligations in FY2026.
What was bought
- Professional services$14.6M75%
- Equipment maintenance$4.8M25%
- Research & development$5000.0%
Where the work was performed
- St. Mary's County, MD$8.8M45%
- Kern County, CA$4.1M21%
- Norfolk city, VA$4M21%
- Pima County, AZ$1.8M9.5%
- Ventura County, CA$613.1K3.2%
- Madison County, AL$5000.0%
Integrity signals
Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.
- Low competition41%US 39% · $8M
- Sole-source awards3.9%US 30% · $764.8K
- Single-offer competitions37%US 8.8% · $7.2M
- Urgency justifications3.9%US 5.1% · $764.8K
A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.
Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts
- Department of the Navy$764.8KDepartment of Defense · 1 awards
Largest awards
- PMA 259$18.2MDepartment of the Navy· St. Mary's County, MD· Professional services· Jan 24, 2024 – Apr 30, 2026· N0042124F0215
- Department of the Navy· Pima County, AZ· Professional services· Mar 6, 2023 – Mar 30, 2026· N6893623F3000
- Department of the Navy· Kern County, CA· Professional services· Jul 24, 2025 – Apr 28, 2026· N6893625F0495
- Department of the Navy· Kern County, CA· Professional services· Jul 6, 2022 – Jun 11, 2026· N6893622F0487
- Department of the Navy· Norfolk city, VA· Equipment maintenance· Sep 22, 2025 – Feb 17, 2026· N6523625F3031
- FWST$5MDepartment of the Navy· Kern County, CA· Professional services· May 31, 2023 – Jun 3, 2026· N6893623F0559
- Department of the Navy· St. Mary's County, MD· Professional services· Apr 27, 2023 – Apr 30, 2026· N0042123F0406
- Department of the Navy· Kern County, CA· Professional services· Jul 3, 2022 – Jan 28, 2026· N6893622F0481
Subawards
Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.
As a prime: who it pays · FY2026
No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.
As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026
No subawards reported to it in FY2026.
Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.
Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.
Teaming partners
Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.
Companies it pays
No subawards reported to other companies.
Primes that pay it
1 company · $1.9M reported
- SPRINGFIELD, VA · 1 subaward · Architectural, engineering, and related services
Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.
Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.
Competitors
Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.
Compared on 2 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.
- MARINE SYSTEMS CORPORATION$59.7M−12% in FY2026BOSTON, MA · 100.0% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related services
- TECH WIZARDS, INC$61.2M−20% in FY2026NEWBURG, MD · 100.0% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related services
- KATMAI PROFESSIONAL SERVICES, LLC$61.8M+36% in FY2026ANCHORAGE, AK · 99% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related services
Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.
Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.
Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.
Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026.