Federal contractor · ALEXANDRIA, VA

SYSTEMS PLANNING AND ANALYSIS - ENVISIONEERING, LLC

SYSTEMS PLANNING AND ANALYSIS - ENVISIONEERING, LLC received $1.4M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 1 awards (−39% vs FY2025). Since FY2019: $19.6M. Its largest customer was Department of the Air Force ($1.4M).

Obligations · FY2026
$1.4M
New awards
1
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
100%
UEI
H28MCG2T23Y4
Small businessVeteran-ownedService-disabled veteran-owned
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 3.6KFY2019
  2. 319.9KFY2021
  3. 4.7MFY2022
  4. 4.8MFY2023
  5. 6MFY2024
  6. 2.3MFY2025
  7. 1.4MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Department of the Air Force$1.4M100%
    1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Research & development$1.4M100%

Where the work was performed

  1. Okaloosa County, FL$1.4M100%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition100%
    US 39% · $1.4M
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions100%
    US 8.7% · $1.4M
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. STAND IN ATTACK WEAPON RESEARCH DEVELOPMENT INTEGRATION AND ANALYSIS$13.3M
    Department of the Air Force· Okaloosa County, FL· Research & development· Mar 21, 2022 – Mar 5, 2026· FA807522F0027

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 1 market (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. ARCTEC SOLUTIONS LLC$9.6M+213% in FY2026
    STERLING, VA · 98% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Scientific research and development services
  2. YORK SPACE SYSTEMS LLC$10.1M−74% in FY2026
    DENVER, CO · 100% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Scientific research and development services
  3. QORVO TEXAS, LLC$9.7M+238% in FY2026
    RICHARDSON, TX · 4 entities · 97% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Scientific research and development services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Matched organizations

  • Systems Planning & Analysis, LLCAI match · 91%
Lobbying · 2025
$230K
4 reports
Lobbying · 2024–2026
$540K

Lobbying by year

  1. 2024$150K
    3 reports
  2. 2025$230K
    4 reports
  3. 2026$160K
    3 reports

Top issues

  1. Defense10 reports
  2. Intelligence and surveillance3 reports

Who was contacted

  1. U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES8 reports
  2. U.S. SENATE4 reports

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

  1. HOLLAND & KNIGHT LLP$490K
    9 reports
  2. Greenberg Traurig, LLP$50K
    1 reports

Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: Analisa AI name judgments (entity-match@1), updated Sep 30, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.