Federal contractor · WASHINGTON, DC

SZPM-ALPHA MPJV

SZPM-ALPHA MPJV received $3.4M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 2 awards (+3,743% vs FY2025). Since FY2025: $3.5M. Its largest customer was Forest Service ($3.4M).

Obligations · FY2026
$3.4M
New awards
2
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
P3T9SMNJ3Z25
Small businessWoman-ownedMinority-owned
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 87.6KFY2025
  2. 3.4MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Forest Service$3.4M100%
    2 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Professional services$3.3M98%
  2. Construction & real property$80.9K2.4%

Where the work was performed

  1. Washington County, VA$3.3M98%
  2. District of Columbia, DC$80.9K2.4%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition0.0%
    US 39% · $0
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.7% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. VIRGINIA CREEPER TRAIL CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION SUPPORT THE CONTRACTOR WILL PERFORM QUALITY ASSURANCE EVALUATIONS ON THE CONSTRUCTION PROGRESS TO RAPIDLY INFORM THE GOVERNMENT PROGRAM MANAGERS, DECIDING OFFICIALS, AND CONTRACTING SPECIALISTS OF WHETHE$3.3M
    Forest Service· Washington County, VA· Professional services· Mar 20, 2026 – Sep 23, 2026· 127EAV26F0016
  2. NRE-3160 APPROVED 07282025 FY26-014110 APPROVED BY LAW GAOA PROJECT 8CN VIRGINIA WATERFALL TRAILS THIS AWARD INCORPORATES THE MANDATORY CONTRACT CLAUSE FAR 52.222 90, ADDRESSING DEI DISCRIMINATION BY FEDERAL CONTRACTORS, AS REQUIRED BY EXECUTIVE O$80.9K
    Forest Service· District of Columbia, DC· Construction & real property· May 14, 2026 – May 14, 2026· 12445126C0015

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 2 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. CASE, LOWE & HART, INC.$2.4M−97% in FY2026
    OGDEN, UT · 69% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveForest Service · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. U.P. ENGINEERS & ARCHITECTS, INC.$2M−85% in FY2026
    HOUGHTON, MI · 57% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveForest Service · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. ROSS BARNEY ARCHITECTS, P.C.$2.1M
    CHICAGO, IL · 56% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveForest Service · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.