Federal contractor · TRENTON, NC

T&M SERVICE GROUP, LLC

T&M SERVICE GROUP, LLC received $12.3M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 48 awards (+259% vs FY2025). Since FY2025: $15.7M. Its largest customer was U.S. Coast Guard ($10.1M).

Obligations · FY2026
$12.3M
New awards
48
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
YEDPX6W9WAM5
Small businessMinority-owned8(a) programNative-owned

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 3.4MFY2025
  2. 12.3MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 45 awards
  2. 1 awards
  3. 1 awards
  4. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Facilities & utilities$9.2M75%
  2. Construction & real property$3.1M25%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition0.0%
    US 39% · -$500
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · -$500
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.7% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. National Institutes of Health· Durham County, NC· Facilities & utilities· Dec 11, 2024 – May 19, 2026· 75N99025C00001
  2. U.S. Coast Guard· Jones County, NC· Construction & real property· Dec 30, 2025 – Sep 11, 2026· 70Z08426FCMAY0003
  3. Department of the Air Force· Greene County, OH· Construction & real property· Apr 1, 2025 – May 27, 2026· FA860125C0014
  4. U.S. Coast Guard· Alameda County, CA· Facilities & utilities· Jun 26, 2026 – Sep 10, 2026· 70Z08426FALAM0059
  5. U.S. Coast Guard· Alameda County, CA· Facilities & utilities· Jun 3, 2026 – Sep 22, 2026· 70Z08426FALAM0057
  6. U.S. Coast Guard· Alameda County, CA· Facilities & utilities· Dec 18, 2025 – Dec 18, 2025· 70Z08426FALAM0010
  7. U.S. Coast Guard· Alameda County, CA· Facilities & utilities· Jun 2, 2026 – Sep 22, 2026· 70Z08426FALAM0056
  8. U.S. Coast Guard· Alameda County, CA· Facilities & utilities· Sep 26, 2025 – Jul 13, 2026· 70Z08425FDL940029

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

2 companies · $193.4K reported

  1. SHIMAR RECYCLING, INC.$191.8K
    DURHAM, NC · 1 subaward · Services to buildings and dwellings
  2. STAMFORD, CT · 1 subaward · Services to buildings and dwellings

Primes that pay it

No prime reported paying it.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 5 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. MISSION HILL, MA · 42% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveU.S. Coast Guard · Facilities support services
  2. ASHVILLE, AL · 71% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveU.S. Coast Guard · Facilities support services
  3. MIDWEST CITY, OK · 47% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveU.S. Coast Guard · Facilities support services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.