Federal contractor · RIYADH

TAD ENVIRONMENT

TAD ENVIRONMENT received $919.8K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 14 awards (+73% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $10.7M. Its largest customer was Defense Logistics Agency ($919.8K).

Obligations · FY2026
$919.8K
New awards
14
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
X79RC86KZPP5
Other than small business

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 566.9KFY2017
  2. 582.8KFY2018
  3. 1.9MFY2019
  4. 1.4MFY2020
  5. 1.1MFY2021
  6. 1.1MFY2022
  7. 1.4MFY2023
  8. 1.2MFY2024
  9. 530.9KFY2025
  10. 919.8KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 14 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Facilities & utilities$919.8K100%

Where the work was performed

  1. Abroad$919.8K100%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition0.0%
    US 39% · $0
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.8% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. Defense Logistics Agency· Facilities & utilities· Dec 1, 2025 – May 12, 2026· SP450026F0904
  2. Defense Logistics Agency· Facilities & utilities· Aug 5, 2025 – Dec 12, 2025· SP450025F7931
  3. Defense Logistics Agency· Facilities & utilities· Sep 16, 2025 – Nov 20, 2025· SP450025F9179
  4. Defense Logistics Agency· Facilities & utilities· Jan 13, 2026 – Feb 17, 2026· SP450026F1879
  5. Defense Logistics Agency· Facilities & utilities· Sep 23, 2025 – Nov 20, 2025· SP450025F9347
  6. Defense Logistics Agency· Facilities & utilities· Jan 13, 2026 – Feb 18, 2026· SP450026F1880
  7. Defense Logistics Agency· Facilities & utilities· Jul 24, 2025 – Nov 18, 2025· SP450025F7590
  8. Defense Logistics Agency· Facilities & utilities· Nov 24, 2025 – Apr 9, 2026· SP450026F0776

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 1 market (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. KIPP MICKELS EQUIPMENT, INC.$3.2M−104% in FY2026
    APPLE VALLEY, CA · 100% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveDefense Logistics Agency · Waste treatment and disposal
  2. TD ENVIRONMENTAL INC$3.2M+21% in FY2026
    WESTFIELD, IN · 100% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveDefense Logistics Agency · Waste treatment and disposal
  3. JFE-K RYUKYU LOGISTIC JV$3.3M−69% in FY2026
    YOKOHAMA, JPN · 100% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveDefense Logistics Agency · Waste treatment and disposal

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026.