Federal contractor · ANCHORAGE, AK
TANAQ ENVIRONMENTAL LLC
TANAQ ENVIRONMENTAL LLC received $1.2M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 6 awards (+25% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $51.9M. Its largest customer was Department of the Air Force ($1M).
- Obligations · FY2026
- $1.2M
- New awards
- 6
- Sole-source
- 100%
- Single offer
- 0.0%
- UEI
- F779K5KMEFJ8
Spending by fiscal year
Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).
- 6.4MFY2017
- 1.4MFY2018
- 6.2MFY2019
- 11MFY2020
- 5.4MFY2021
- 7.9MFY2022
- 10.3MFY2023
- 1.2MFY2024
- 942.6KFY2025
- 1.2MFY2026
Top buying agencies
Obligations in FY2026.
- 1 awards
- Department of the Army$153.3K13%4 awards
- Department of the Navy$00.0%1 awards
What was bought · Where the work was performed
Obligations in FY2026.
What was bought
- Facilities & utilities$979.1K83%
- Professional services$197.8K17%
Where the work was performed
- Montgomery County, AL$1M87%
- Monterey County, CA$197.8K17%
Integrity signals
Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.
- Low competition100%US 39% · $1.2M
- Sole-source awards100%US 30% · $1.2M
- Single-offer competitions0.0%US 8.7% · $0
- Urgency justifications0.0%US 5.1% · $0
A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.
Largest awards
- Department of the Army· Maricopa County, AZ· Facilities & utilities· Jun 30, 2020 – Nov 20, 2025· W912PL20C0026
- Department of the Army· Yuma County, AZ· Facilities & utilities· Sep 26, 2023 – Dec 11, 2025· W912PL23C0026
- Department of the Air Force· Montgomery County, AL· Facilities & utilities· Jun 26, 2023 – Jun 8, 2026· FA890323C0009
- Department of the Army· Anchorage Municipality, AK· Facilities & utilities· Sep 29, 2022 – Nov 26, 2025· W9128F22F0309
- Department of the Navy· Solano County, CA· Facilities & utilities· Jun 8, 2023 – Jun 4, 2026· N6247323C0402
- REM SERVICES$395.7KDepartment of the Army· Monterey County, CA· Professional services· Jan 19, 2024 – Apr 3, 2026· W9124J24C0009
Competitors
Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.
Compared on 4 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.
- TEX-SAN SITE SERVICE LLC$2.4M−5.5% in FY2026ADKINS, TX · 72% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Remediation and other waste management services
- BES-LATA JV, LLC$2.3MANCHORAGE, AK · 69% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Remediation and other waste management services
- BRICE APTIM JV LLC$2.6MANCHORAGE, AK · 73% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Remediation and other waste management services
Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.
Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.
Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.
Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.