Federal contractor · ALAMEDA, CA

TANNER ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES LLC

TANNER ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES LLC received $1.2M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 6 awards (+145% vs FY2025). Since FY2024: $1.7M. Its largest customer was Bureau of Land Management ($896.2K).

Obligations · FY2026
$1.2M
New awards
6
Sole-source
14%
Single offer
38%
UEI
HU5KNFGXB9G6
Small business

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 2.5KFY2024
  2. 477.8KFY2025
  3. 1.2MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 3 awards
  2. Forest Service$276.8K24%
    3 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Facilities & utilities$1.2M100%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition52%
    US 39% · $610.5K
  • Sole-source awards14%
    US 30% · $161.8K
  • Single-offer competitions38%
    US 8.7% · $448.7K
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. Department of Agriculture · 1 awards

Largest awards

  1. Bureau of Land Management· Jackson County, OR· Facilities & utilities· Mar 11, 2026 – Aug 6, 2026· 140L4326F0025
  2. Bureau of Land Management· Jackson County, OR· Facilities & utilities· Mar 13, 2025 – Mar 20, 2026· 140L4325F0014
  3. Bureau of Land Management· Jackson County, OR· Facilities & utilities· Mar 19, 2026 – Aug 6, 2026· 140L4326F0020
  4. Forest Service· Plumas County, CA· Facilities & utilities· May 21, 2026 – May 21, 2026· 12363N26F4098
  5. Forest Service· Larimer County, CO· Facilities & utilities· Jun 15, 2026 – Jun 15, 2026· 1240BG26F0018
  6. Forest Service· Shasta County, CA· Facilities & utilities· Dec 17, 2025 – Aug 12, 2026· 12363N26F4034

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 3 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. PORTLAND, OR · 80% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveBureau of Land Management · Other professional, scientific, and technical servicesBureau of Land Management · Support activities for forestryForest Service · Support activities for forestry
  2. WHEATLAND, WY · 61% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveBureau of Land Management · Other professional, scientific, and technical services
  3. DELTA, UT · 43% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveBureau of Land Management · Other professional, scientific, and technical services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.