Federal contractor · NEWHOPE, AR

TARGET APPLICATORS, INC.

TARGET APPLICATORS, INC. received $75.4K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 3 awards (−37% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $1.2M. Its largest customer was Department of the Army ($75.4K).

Obligations · FY2026
$75.4K
New awards
3
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
JA42MLDMQ4R5
Small businessWoman-owned
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 61.3KFY2017
  2. 152.7KFY2018
  3. 108.7KFY2019
  4. 110.3KFY2020
  5. 65.2KFY2021
  6. 143.8KFY2022
  7. 157.7KFY2023
  8. 212.7KFY2024
  9. 119.2KFY2025
  10. 75.4KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Department of the Army$75.4K100%
    3 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Facilities & utilities$75.4K100%

Where the work was performed

  1. Sevier County, AR$50K66%
  2. Howard County, AR$25.5K34%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition0.0%
    US 39% · $0
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.8% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. MOWING SERVICES-TASK ORDER 3-DEQUEEN PROJECT OFFICE$26K
    Department of the Army· Sevier County, AR· Facilities & utilities· Apr 22, 2026 – Apr 22, 2026· W9127S26FA079
  2. MOWING SERVICE TASK ORDER 2-DIERKS PROJECT OFFICE$25.5K
    Department of the Army· Howard County, AR· Facilities & utilities· Apr 22, 2026 – Apr 22, 2026· W9127S26FA077
  3. MOWING SERVICES, TASK ORDER 2, GILLHAM LAKE$24K
    Department of the Army· Sevier County, AR· Facilities & utilities· Jun 5, 2026 – Jun 5, 2026· W9127S26FA086

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 1 market (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. JOSEPH C GOODLAND$406.4K
    NEW BRAUNFELS, TX · 99.8% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Services to buildings and dwellings
  2. ESTATE MANAGEMENT SERVICES OF MISSOURI, LLC$403.7K−21% in FY2026
    WILLARD, MO · 99% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Services to buildings and dwellings
  3. MAURO GUIDONI S.R.L.$402K−39% in FY2026
    PISTOIA, ITA · 99% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Services to buildings and dwellings

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026.