Federal contractor · ANCHORAGE, AK
TATITLEK UNIVERSAL SERVICES INC
TATITLEK UNIVERSAL SERVICES INC received $1.6M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 5 awards (−76% vs FY2025). Since FY2023: $37.5M. Its largest customer was Department of the Army ($1.6M).
- Obligations · FY2026
- $1.6M
- New awards
- 5
- Sole-source
- 100%
- Single offer
- 0.0%
- UEI
- RN3HXJFWXMY4
Company family
Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.
Part of the TATITLEK FEDERAL SERVICES LLC company family: 3 registered entities, $82.2M in FY2026 together. See the family
- TATITLEK FEDERAL SERVICES LLCANCHORAGE, AK · Family page$80.5M
- TATITLEK TRAINING SERVICES, INC.ANCHORAGE, AK$0
AI-inferred: entity-match@1 · Analisa AI · 2026-09-30
Spending by fiscal year
Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).
- 3.2MFY2023
- 26MFY2024
- 6.7MFY2025
- 1.6MFY2026
Top buying agencies
Obligations in FY2026.
- Department of the Army$1.6M99%2 awards
- Department of the Air Force$9,1000.6%3 awards
What was bought · Where the work was performed
Obligations in FY2026.
What was bought
- Construction & real property$1.6M100%
Where the work was performed
- Oklahoma County, OK$1.6M100%
Integrity signals
Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.
- Low competition100%US 39% · $1.6M
- Sole-source awards100%US 30% · $1.6M
- Single-offer competitions0.0%US 8.8% · $0
- Urgency justifications0.0%US 5.1% · $0
A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.
Largest awards
- PROJECT INCLUDES DESIGN PREPARATION, DEMOLITION, AND NEW CONSTRUCTION AT B9001 CMXG AUTOCLAVE.$21.1MDepartment of the Army· Oklahoma County, OK· Construction & real property· Sep 30, 2024 – Mar 6, 2026· W912BV24C0025
- Department of the Army· Oklahoma County, OK· Construction & real property· May 8, 2025 – May 14, 2026· W912BV25C0010
- Department of the Air Force· Oklahoma County, OK· Construction & real property· Sep 27, 2023 – Dec 16, 2025· FA890323C0042
- Department of the Air Force· Oklahoma County, OK· Construction & real property· Sep 25, 2024 – Apr 22, 2026· FA890324C0023
- Department of the Air Force· Oklahoma County, OK· Construction & real property· Sep 10, 2025 – Mar 12, 2026· FA890325C0024
Competitors
Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.
Compared on 22 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.
- MICHAEL STAPLETON ASSOCIATES, LTD.$103.7M−21% in FY2026NEW YORK, NY · 26% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveState · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services
- MEC ENERGY SERVICES LLC$143.6M−18% in FY2026NEW TOWN, ND · 2 entities · 27% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveState · Management, scientific, and technical consulting servicesAir Force · Architectural, engineering, and related services
- SYSTEMS TECHNOLOGIES, INC.$61.6M+59% in FY2026WEST LONG BRANCH, NJ · 21% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Scientific research and development servicesNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related services
Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.
Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.
Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.
Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026.