Federal contractor · DALLAS, TX

TEAM CONSULTANTS INC

TEAM CONSULTANTS INC received $41.9K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 11 awards (−44% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $979.6K. Its largest customer was Department of the Army ($41.9K).

Obligations · FY2026
$41.9K
New awards
11
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
100%
UEI
MK4BNH6FXNY9
Small business

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 101.7KFY2017
  2. 182.2KFY2018
  3. 79KFY2019
  4. 154.5KFY2020
  5. 122.1KFY2021
  6. 69.1KFY2022
  7. 53.1KFY2023
  8. 101.4KFY2024
  9. 74.6KFY2025
  10. 41.9KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 11 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Facilities & utilities$41.9K100%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition100%
    US 39% · $41.9K
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions100%
    US 8.7% · $41.9K
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. Department of the Army· Dallas County, TX· Facilities & utilities· Nov 10, 2025 – Nov 10, 2025· W9126G26FA007
  2. Department of the Army· Dallas County, TX· Facilities & utilities· Mar 10, 2026 – Mar 10, 2026· W9126G26FA098
  3. Department of the Army· Dallas County, TX· Facilities & utilities· Nov 21, 2025 – Mar 3, 2026· W9126G26FA017
  4. Department of the Army· Dallas County, TX· Facilities & utilities· Aug 19, 2025 – Nov 13, 2025· W9126G25FA065
  5. Department of the Army· Dallas County, TX· Facilities & utilities· Dec 15, 2025 – Feb 13, 2026· W9126G26FA028
  6. Department of the Army· Dallas County, TX· Facilities & utilities· May 12, 2026 – May 12, 2026· W9126G26FA179
  7. Department of the Army· Dallas County, TX· Facilities & utilities· Nov 21, 2025 – Nov 21, 2025· W9126G26FA018
  8. Department of the Army· Dallas County, TX· Facilities & utilities· May 14, 2026 – May 14, 2026· W9126G26FA180

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 1 market (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. BALDESCHI DANIELA$225.9K+95% in FY2026
    VICENZA, ITA · 100% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. MODJESKI AND MASTERS, INC$245.5K−100% in FY2026
    MECHANICSBURG, PA · 100% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. COLUMBIA, MD · 100% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026.