Federal contractor · CASTLE PINES, CO
TECHNICAL MANAGEMENT SERVICES LLC
TECHNICAL MANAGEMENT SERVICES LLC received $459.8K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 4 awards (−35% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $4.3M. Its largest customer was Defense Finance and Accounting Service ($449.9K).
- Obligations · FY2026
- $459.8K
- New awards
- 4
- Sole-source
- 0.0%
- Single offer
- 0.0%
- UEI
- YZUCELZVKTF6
Spending by fiscal year
Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).
- 50.2KFY2017
- 130.7KFY2018
- 74.6KFY2019
- 142.3KFY2020
- 295KFY2021
- 490.7KFY2022
- 805.5KFY2023
- 1.2MFY2024
- 705.9KFY2025
- 459.8KFY2026
Top buying agencies
Obligations in FY2026.
- Defense Finance and Accounting Service$449.9K98%1 awards
- Federal Acquisition Service$93.1K20%1 awards
- Department of the Army$8,9101.9%1 awards
- Department of the Navy-$92.1K0.0%1 awards
What was bought · Where the work was performed
Obligations in FY2026.
What was bought
- Education & social services$450.9K98%
- Professional services$8,9101.9%
Where the work was performed
- Douglas County, CO$450.9K98%
- Geary County, KS$8,9101.9%
Integrity signals
Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.
- Low competition0.0%US 39% · $0
- Sole-source awards0.0%US 30% · $0
- Single-offer competitions0.0%US 8.8% · $0
- Urgency justifications0.0%US 5.1% · $0
A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.
Largest awards
- Department of the Navy· Douglas County, CO· Education & social services· Sep 28, 2022 – Jan 14, 2026· N6339422F0043
- LEADERSHIP TRAINING$449.9KDefense Finance and Accounting Service· Douglas County, CO· Education & social services· Nov 18, 2025 – Feb 6, 2026· HQ042326FE004
- Federal Acquisition Service· Douglas County, CO· Education & social services· Sep 21, 2026 – Sep 21, 2026· 47QTCX26F0008
- Department of the Army· Geary County, KS· Professional services· Dec 5, 2025 – Dec 5, 2025· W912QR26FA016
Competitors
Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.
Compared on 8 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.
- CEEK LLC$1.2MCARY, NC · 51% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveDefense Finance and Accounting Service · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services
- ENLIGHTENEERING, INC.$827.8K−59% in FY2026DUNCAN, OK · 20% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveDefense Finance and Accounting Service · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services
- VERGENCE LLC$7.9M−76% in FY2026INDIANAPOLIS, IN · 41% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveDefense Finance and Accounting Service · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services
Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.
Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.
Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.
Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026.