Federal contractor · ANNAPOLIS, MD

TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT & TRANSFER, INC

No contract obligations recorded for TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT & TRANSFER, INC in FY2026. Since FY2017: $9.9M. Its largest customer was Department of the Army ($0).

Obligations · FY2026
$0
New awards
1
Sole-source
—
Single offer
—
UEI
MNGNMTT66L71
Small businessWoman-owned

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

2 registered entities of the same company or corporate group, $0 in FY2026 together.

  1. TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT & TRANSFER, INCANNAPOLIS, MD · Family page
    $0
  2. SINTX TECHNOLOGIES, INC.SALT LAKE CITY, UT
    $0

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 3.8MFY2017
  2. 1.5MFY2018
  3. 1.2MFY2019
  4. 489.1KFY2020
  5. 761.3KFY2021
  6. 984.7KFY2022
  7. 518.8KFY2023
  8. 590.7KFY2024
  9. 15KFY2025
  10. 0FY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

Largest awards

  1. Department of the Army· Anne Arundel County, MD· Research & development· Sep 6, 2022 – Jan 29, 2026· W912CG22C0034

Federal grants & assistance received

Grants, loans (counted at their subsidy cost), direct payments and insurance, by fiscal year of the action (USAspending.gov, FABS). Reported apart from contracts and never added to them.

TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT & TRANSFER, INC received $0 in federal assistance in FY2026, on 0 actions (0 new awards).

Assistance · FY2026
$0
New awards
0
Actions
0
Since FY2021
$1.3M

Assistance by fiscal year

  1. 166.9KFY2021
  2. 1.1MFY2022
  3. -1.8KFY2023
  4. 0FY2024
  5. 0FY2025

Source: Federal financial assistance transactions (Financial Assistance Broker Submission) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · FY2021–FY2025.

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

1 company · $46.1K reported

  1. COLUMBUS, OH · 1 subaward · Facilities support services

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 4 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. RIVER OTTER RENEWABLES, INC$674.3K−100% in FY2026
    STOW, MA · 95% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Scientific research and development servicesAir Force · Scientific research and development services
  2. SMART MATERIAL SOLUTIONS, LLC$664.5K−100% in FY2026
    RALEIGH, NC · 92% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Scientific research and development servicesAir Force · Scientific research and development services
  3. NEW YORK, NY · 84% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Scientific research and development servicesNavy · Scientific research and development services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026.