Federal contractor · PRESCOTT, AZ

TECHNOLOGY CONSTRUCTION INC

No contract obligations recorded for TECHNOLOGY CONSTRUCTION INC in FY2026. Since FY2017: $1.6M.

Obligations · FY2026
$0
New awards
0
Sole-source
—
Single offer
—
UEI
D7W2LHBGFLK4
Parent company
CONSTRUCTION TECHNOLOGY LABORATORIES INC
Small business
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

2 registered entities of the same company or corporate group, $51.2K in FY2026 together.

  1. TECHNOLOGY CONSTRUCTION INCPRESCOTT, AZ · Family page
    $0
  2. CONSTRUCTION TECHNOLOGY LABORATORIES INCMOUNT PROSPECT, IL
    $51.2K

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 67.2KFY2017
  2. 1.6MFY2023
  3. -59.6KFY2024

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

No contract obligations recorded for TECHNOLOGY CONSTRUCTION INC in FY2026.

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

3 companies · $1.4M reported

  1. MANSON CONSTRUCTION CO$661.7K
    SEATTLE, WA · 5 subawards · Other heavy and civil engineering construction
  2. STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES INC.$563.7K
    DENVER, CO · 3 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. SAVANNAH RIVER REMEDIATION LLC$170K
    AIKEN, SC · 1 subaward · Other miscellaneous manufacturing

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 3 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS LLC$119.8K
    MARLBOROUGH, CT · 100% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNuclear Regulatory Commission · Business schools and computer and management training
  2. C R ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTION SERVICES, INC.$104.7K−100% in FY2026
    WILLIAMSBURG, VA · 88% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNuclear Regulatory Commission · Business schools and computer and management training
  3. SPEC150, LLC$160K0% in FY2026
    SAINT ROSE, LA · 100% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNuclear Regulatory Commission · Business schools and computer and management training

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026.