Federal contractor · BERGENFIELD, NJ

TECHNOLOGY DYNAMICS, INC.

No contract obligations recorded for TECHNOLOGY DYNAMICS, INC. in FY2026. Since FY2017: $867.9K.

Obligations · FY2026
$0
New awards
0
Sole-source
—
Single offer
—
UEI
YMMLP9N1GZR3
Small business
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

Part of the TECHNOLOGY DYNAMICS, INC. company family: 3 registered entities, $569.8K in FY2026 together. See the family

  1. TECHNOLOGY DYNAMICS, INC.BERGENFIELD, NJ · Family page
    $569.8K
  2. TECHNOLOGY DYNAMICS, INC.BERGENFIELD, NJ
    $0

AI-inferred: entity-match@1 · Analisa AI · 2026-09-30

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 188.4KFY2017
  2. 103.7KFY2018
  3. 113.4KFY2019
  4. 242.5KFY2020
  5. 9.9KFY2021
  6. 35.8KFY2022
  7. 138.7KFY2023
  8. 35.5KFY2024

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

No contract obligations recorded for TECHNOLOGY DYNAMICS, INC. in FY2026.

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $266.4K (4 subawards)

2 primes

  1. SIERRA NEVADA COMPANY, LLC$218K82%
    ENGLEWOOD, CO · 3 subawards
  2. NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORPORATION$48.4K18%
    CHANDLER, AZ · 1 subaward

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $0 paid out · $755.7K received
  • FY2022: $0 paid out · $1.8M received
  • FY2023: $0 paid out · $1.8M received
  • FY2024: $0 paid out · $1.8M received
  • FY2025: $0 paid out · $923.2K received
  • FY2026: $0 paid out · $266.4K received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

23 companies · $52.8M reported

  1. RAYTHEON COMPANY$29.3M
    TUCSON, AZ · 33 subawards · Navigational, measuring, electromedical, and control instruments manufacturing
  2. SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION$4.5M
    RESTON, VA · 19 subawards · Other electrical equipment and component manufacturing
  3. BELL TEXTRON INC$3.3M
    FORT WORTH, TX · 12 subawards · Ship and boat building

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 15 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. HDL RESEARCH LAB INC$4.8M−99% in FY2026
    BRENHAM, TX · 65% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Other electrical equipment and component manufacturingDefense Logistics Agency · Other electrical equipment and component manufacturingNavy · Other fabricated metal product manufacturing+2 more
  2. PACIFIC POWER SOURCE INC$2M−14% in FY2026
    IRVINE, CA · 39% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Other electrical equipment and component manufacturingAir Force · Other electrical equipment and component manufacturingNavy · Electrical equipment manufacturing+1 more
  3. TIDEWATER MARINE ELECTRIC LLC$1.5M−64% in FY2026
    VIRGINIA BEACH, VA · 34% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveDefense Logistics Agency · Other electrical equipment and component manufacturingNavy · Other electrical equipment and component manufacturingNavy · Electrical equipment manufacturing+3 more

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026.