Federal contractor · SAN ANTONIO, TX

TEXAS MGT ASSOCIATES INC

TEXAS MGT ASSOCIATES INC received $1.1M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 21 awards (−15% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $9.3M. Its largest customer was Department of the Navy ($586K).

Obligations · FY2026
$1.1M
New awards
21
Sole-source
73%
Single offer
16%
UEI
N9X8D32FT553
Parent company
TEXAS MGT ASSOCIATES INC
Small businessMinority-owned

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 564.3KFY2017
  2. 489.4KFY2018
  3. 749.5KFY2019
  4. 384.5KFY2020
  5. 2.7MFY2021
  6. 409.3KFY2022
  7. 756.4KFY2023
  8. 879.2KFY2024
  9. 1.3MFY2025
  10. 1.1MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 1 awards
  2. 8 awards
  3. 10 awards
  4. 2 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Other equipment & supplies$675.8K63%
  2. Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles$249.8K23%
  3. Equipment maintenance$139.7K13%

Where the work was performed

  1. Pima County, AZ$46.1K4.3%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition89%
    US 39% · $953.3K
  • Sole-source awards73%
    US 30% · $779.7K
  • Single-offer competitions16%
    US 8.7% · $173.6K
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. Department of Defense · 1 awards
  2. Department of Defense · 2 awards

Largest awards

  1. Department of the Navy· Bexar County, TX· Other equipment & supplies· May 7, 2026 – May 7, 2026· N6833526C0234
  2. Department of the Air Force· Bexar County, TX· Other equipment & supplies· Aug 28, 2023 – Dec 15, 2025· FA852623C0003
  3. Department of the Army· Bexar County, TX· Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles· Dec 5, 2025 – Dec 5, 2025· W50S7826PA002
  4. Department of the Army· Bexar County, TX· Other equipment & supplies· Apr 2, 2026 – Apr 2, 2026· W50S7F26FA005
  5. Department of the Air Force· Bexar County, TX· Other equipment & supplies· Sep 12, 2024 – Nov 25, 2025· FA852624P0013
  6. Department of the Army· Pima County, AZ· Equipment maintenance· May 28, 2026 – May 28, 2026· W50S6S26PA004
  7. Department of the Army· Bexar County, TX· Equipment maintenance· Jan 15, 2026 – Jan 15, 2026· W50S7F26FA002
  8. Defense Logistics Agency· Bexar County, TX· Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles· Jun 9, 2026 – Jun 9, 2026· SPE4A726F7745

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

1 company · $183.9K reported

  1. NORTHAMPTON, MA · 1 subaward · Ship and boat building

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 13 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. PINNACLE DEFENSE SYSTEMS, INC$1.3M−79% in FY2026
    SUNRISE, FL · 35% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Aerospace product and parts manufacturingDefense Logistics Agency · Aerospace product and parts manufacturingDefense Logistics Agency · Semiconductor and other electronic component manufacturing+2 more
  2. ORQA INC$1.4M−100% in FY2026
    CASTRO VALLEY, CA · 33% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing
  3. VANTAGE ROBOTICS, INC.$1.4M−74% in FY2026
    SAN LEANDRO, CA · 32% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.