Federal contractor · LAKEWOOD, CO

THE ABO GROUP, INC.

THE ABO GROUP, INC. received -$58.6K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 3 awards (−109% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $4M. Its largest customer was U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service ($23.2K).

Obligations · FY2026
-$58.6K
New awards
3
Sole-source
—
Single offer
—
UEI
M4Y3LEDAY2R3
Small businessMinority-owned
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 276.5KFY2017
  2. 630.7KFY2018
  3. 65.9KFY2019
  4. 209.6KFY2020
  5. 705.6KFY2021
  6. 620.2KFY2022
  7. 530.9KFY2023
  8. 329.5KFY2024
  9. 675KFY2025
  10. -58.6KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service$23.2K0.0%
    1 awards
  2. Forest Service-$81.8K0.0%
    2 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

Where the work was performed

  1. Alamosa County, CO$23.2K0.0%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

Largest awards

  1. CO-SAN LUIS VLY NWR-A&E SERVICES SHOP$684.5K
    U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service· Alamosa County, CO· Construction & real property· Jan 21, 2025 – May 21, 2026· 140FGA25F0002
  2. BIL PSICC SPL CIM BUFFALO CREEK FIRE OPERATIONS BLDG Q CODE. APPLICABLE CONTRACT: DOI A-E MATOC (140F0822D0180 - 140F0822D324.$578.9K
    Forest Service· Jefferson County, CO· Construction & real property· Sep 25, 2023 – Apr 17, 2026· 1240LT23F0068
  3. TITLE III SERVICES$0
    Forest Service· Grand County, CO· Construction & real property· Apr 20, 2026 – Apr 20, 2026· 1240LT26F0013

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

This section could not be loaded right now. Reload the page to try again.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 3 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. SFS ARCHITECTURE INC$766.9K−100% in FY2026
    KANSAS CITY, MO · 75% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveU.S. Fish and Wildlife Service · Architectural, engineering, and related servicesForest Service · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. CEC-CDM SMITH II A JOINT VENTURE$836.5K−83% in FY2026
    BONITA SPRINGS, FL · 72% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveU.S. Fish and Wildlife Service · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. J.V. BURKES & ASSOCIATES, INC$583.3K−100% in FY2026
    SLIDELL, LA · 62% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveU.S. Fish and Wildlife Service · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

This section could not be loaded right now. Reload the page to try again.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.