Federal contractor · PEACHTREE CORNERS, GA

THE AVERY GROUP, LLC

THE AVERY GROUP, LLC received $2.4M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 5 awards (+6.8% vs FY2025). Since FY2023: $7.1M. Its largest customer was Centers for Disease Control and Prevention ($2M).

Obligations · FY2026
$2.4M
New awards
5
Sole-source
72%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
H99KDBFT4RD5
Small businessVeteran-ownedService-disabled veteran-ownedMinority-owned8(a) program

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 119.2KFY2023
  2. 2.5MFY2024
  3. 2.2MFY2025
  4. 2.4MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 3 awards
  2. 1 awards
  3. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Professional services$2.4M100.0%
  2. Research & development$5000.0%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition72%
    US 39% · $1.7M
  • Sole-source awards72%
    US 30% · $1.7M
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.8% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention· Prince George's County, MD· Professional services· Aug 28, 2024 – Jun 9, 2026· 75D30124C19116
  2. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention· DeKalb County, GA· Professional services· May 21, 2024 – Jun 9, 2026· 75D30124P19019
  3. Office of the Assistant Secretary for Financial Resources· DeKalb County, GA· Professional services· Aug 23, 2024 – Jul 30, 2026· 75D30124C19363
  4. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention· DeKalb County, GA· Professional services· Sep 4, 2026 – Sep 4, 2026· 75D30126F21511
  5. Missile Defense Agency· Madison County, AL· Research & development· Dec 19, 2025 – Jun 4, 2026· HQ085926FG134

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $972.7K (3 subawards)

1 prime

  1. EATONTOWN, NJ · 3 subawards

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $0 paid out · $2M received
  • FY2022: $0 paid out · $3.6M received
  • FY2023: $0 paid out · $512.8K received
  • FY2024: $0 paid out · $2.2M received
  • FY2025: $0 paid out · $1.1M received
  • FY2026: $0 paid out · $972.7K received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 8, 2026, loaded Oct 8, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

2 companies · $10.5M reported

  1. MCLEAN, VA · 25 subawards · Computer systems design and related services
  2. ARLINGTON, VA · 3 subawards · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 8, 2026, loaded Oct 8, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 6 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. ATLANTA, GA · 61% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveCenters for Disease Control and Prevention · Management, scientific, and technical consulting servicesCenters for Disease Control and Prevention · Other professional, scientific, and technical services
  2. DANIEL J EDELMAN INC$3.1M−238% in FY2026
    CHICAGO, IL · 2 entities · 39% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveCenters for Disease Control and Prevention · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services
  3. DENVER, CO · 52% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveCenters for Disease Control and Prevention · Other professional, scientific, and technical servicesCenters for Disease Control and Prevention · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026.