Federal contractor · TORONTO

THE GOVERNING COUNCIL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO

No contract obligations recorded for THE GOVERNING COUNCIL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO in FY2026. Since FY2017: $643.3K. It also received $5.3M in federal grants and other assistance in FY2026.

Obligations · FY2026
$0
New awards
0
Sole-source
—
Single offer
—
UEI
NBMSSFM3HP56
Other than small businessNonprofitEducational institution

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 77.8KFY2017
  2. -2.5KFY2019
  3. -455.5FY2020
  4. 157.3KFY2021
  5. 203.2KFY2022
  6. 124KFY2023
  7. 112KFY2024
  8. -27.9KFY2025

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

No contract obligations recorded for THE GOVERNING COUNCIL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO in FY2026.

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

Federal grants & assistance received

Grants, loans (counted at their subsidy cost), direct payments and insurance, by fiscal year of the action (USAspending.gov, FABS). Reported apart from contracts and never added to them.

THE GOVERNING COUNCIL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO received $5.3M in federal assistance in FY2026, on 43 actions (3 new awards), +29% vs FY2025. Its largest program was 93.855 · Allergy and Infectious Diseases Research ($1.9M).

Assistance · FY2026
$5.3M
New awards
3
Actions
43
Since FY2021
$33.2M

Assistance by fiscal year

  1. 4.6MFY2021
  2. 7.4MFY2022
  3. 7.7MFY2023
  4. 4.1MFY2024
  5. 4.1MFY2025
  6. 5.3MFY2026

By type

  1. Grants$5.1M96%
  2. Other assistance$225K4.2%

Top programs

  1. 93.855 · Allergy and Infectious Diseases Research$1.9M35%
  2. 93.173 · Research Related to Deafness and Communication Disorders$944.3K18%
  3. 12.800 · Air Force Defense Research Sciences Program$811.4K15%
  4. 11.431 · Climate and Atmospheric Research$369.3K6.9%
  5. 93.867 · Vision Research$305.7K5.7%
  6. 93.837 · Cardiovascular Diseases Research$270K5.1%
  7. 12.300 · Basic and Applied Scientific Research$269.7K5.1%
  8. 47.049 · Mathematical and Physical Sciences$266.7K5.0%

Awarding agencies

  1. Department of Health and Human Services
  2. Department of Defense
  3. Department of Commerce
  4. Department of Defense
  5. Department of Defense

Largest awards

  1. 93.172 · Human Genome Research· National Institutes of Health· Project grant· Nov 20, 2020 – Apr 16, 2026· R01HG005853
  2. 93.855 · Allergy and Infectious Diseases Research· National Institutes of Health· Project grant· Sep 23, 2022 – Aug 5, 2026· R01AI127375
  3. 93.867 · Vision Research· National Institutes of Health· Project grant· Jul 22, 2022 – May 25, 2026· R01EY025641
  4. 93.855 · Allergy and Infectious Diseases Research· National Institutes of Health· Project grant· Jul 21, 2022 – Jun 25, 2026· R01AI165466
  5. 93.855 · Allergy and Infectious Diseases Research· National Institutes of Health· Project grant· Mar 21, 2022 – Jan 9, 2026· R01AI162789
  6. 93.173 · Research Related to Deafness and Communication Disorders· National Institutes of Health· Project grant· Sep 13, 2021 – Jun 23, 2026· R01DC019337

Source: Federal financial assistance transactions (Financial Assistance Broker Submission) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · FY2021–FY2026.

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

  • Sub-grants: $835.5K (6 subawards)

5 sub-recipients

  1. SAN FRANCISCO, CA · 1 subaward
  2. BOSTON, MA · 1 subaward
  3. DALLAS, TX · 2 subawards
  4. DUKE UNIVERSITY$80.5K9.6%
    DURHAM, NC · 1 subaward
  5. MINNEAPOLIS, MN · 1 subaward

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-grants: $2.8M (18 subawards)

7 primes

  1. PHILADELPHIA, PA · 11 subawards
  2. COLUMBUS, OH · 2 subawards
  3. ATLANTA, GA · 1 subaward
  4. BROWN UNIVERSITY$138.1K4.9%
    PROVIDENCE, RI · 1 subaward
  5. CLEVELAND, OH · 1 subaward
  6. URBANA, IL · 1 subaward
  7. TAMPA, FL · 1 subaward

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $142.9K paid out · $3.2M received
  • FY2022: $1.3M paid out · $5.2M received
  • FY2023: $1.1M paid out · $8.8M received
  • FY2024: $1M paid out · $6M received
  • FY2025: $1.6M paid out · $5.7M received
  • FY2026: $835.5K paid out · $2.8M received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

11 companies · $6.1M reported

  1. SAN FRANCISCO, CA · 5 subawards
  2. BOSTON, MA · 5 subawards
  3. CHAPEL HILL, NC · 4 subawards

Primes that pay it

70 companies · $31.7M reported

  1. ATLANTA, GA · 8 subawards
  2. PHILADELPHIA, PA · 29 subawards
  3. ATLANTA, GA · 9 subawards

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 1 market (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. BOZEMAN, MT · 94% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNational Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services
  2. PRESCOTT, AZ · 100% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNational Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services
  3. EXA DATA & MAPPING, INC.$70.1K−100% in FY2026
    POULSBO, WA · 83% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNational Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026.