Federal contractor · FORT WORTH, TX

THE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER AT FORT WORTH

THE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER AT FORT WORTH received $33.8M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 113 awards (+4.2% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $312.2M. Its largest customer was Federal Prison System / Bureau of Prisons ($32.8M). It also received $44.6M in federal grants and other assistance in FY2026.

Obligations · FY2026
$33.8M
New awards
113
Sole-source
1.3%
Single offer
3.8%
UEI
JE8AKPCR2KA4
Other than small businessEducational institutionGovernment entity

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

2 registered entities of the same company or corporate group, $33.8M in FY2026 together.

  1. THE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER AT FORT WORTHFORT WORTH, TX · Family page
    $33.8M
  2. $0

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 31.7MFY2017
  2. 35MFY2018
  3. 42.9MFY2019
  4. 47.8MFY2020
  5. 35.4MFY2021
  6. 3.3MFY2022
  7. 23.2MFY2023
  8. 26.6MFY2024
  9. 32.4MFY2025
  10. 33.8MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 108 awards
  2. 1 awards
  3. 3 awards
  4. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Health & medical$33.1M98%
  2. Professional services$710.2K2.1%
  3. Education & social services$24.8K0.1%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition5.1%
    US 39% · $1.7M
  • Sole-source awards1.3%
    US 30% · $438.9K
  • Single-offer competitions3.8%
    US 8.7% · $1.3M
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. Department of Justice · 1 awards
  2. Department of Defense · 1 awards

Largest awards

  1. National Institutes of Health· Tarrant County, TX· Professional services· Dec 23, 2022 – Jun 11, 2026· 75N95023C00002
  2. Federal Prison System / Bureau of Prisons· Tarrant County, TX· Health & medical· May 13, 2026 – Sep 17, 2026· 15B50926F00000106
  3. Federal Prison System / Bureau of Prisons· Tarrant County, TX· Health & medical· Nov 5, 2024 – Aug 17, 2026· 15B50925F00000017
  4. Federal Prison System / Bureau of Prisons· Tarrant County, TX· Health & medical· May 13, 2026 – Jul 17, 2026· 15B50926F00000105
  5. Federal Prison System / Bureau of Prisons· Tarrant County, TX· Health & medical· May 13, 2026 – Jul 17, 2026· 15B50926F00000109
  6. Federal Prison System / Bureau of Prisons· Tarrant County, TX· Health & medical· May 13, 2026 – Jul 17, 2026· 15B50926F00000107
  7. Federal Prison System / Bureau of Prisons· Tarrant County, TX· Health & medical· May 13, 2026 – Jul 17, 2026· 15B50926F00000108
  8. Federal Prison System / Bureau of Prisons· Tarrant County, TX· Health & medical· Apr 29, 2026 – Jul 17, 2026· 15B50926F00000102

Federal grants & assistance received

Grants, loans (counted at their subsidy cost), direct payments and insurance, by fiscal year of the action (USAspending.gov, FABS). Reported apart from contracts and never added to them.

THE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER AT FORT WORTH received $44.6M in federal assistance in FY2026, on 144 actions (13 new awards), −33% vs FY2025. Its largest program was 93.866 · Aging Research ($34.7M).

Assistance · FY2026
$44.6M
New awards
13
Actions
144
Since FY2021
$474.5M

Assistance by fiscal year

  1. 100.8MFY2021
  2. 81.6MFY2022
  3. 93.9MFY2023
  4. 87.1MFY2024
  5. 66.5MFY2025
  6. 44.6MFY2026

By type

  1. Grants$40.8M92%
  2. Direct payments$3.7M8.4%

Top programs

  1. 93.866 · Aging Research$34.7M78%
  2. 93.928 · Special Projects of National Significance$4M9.0%
  3. 93.310 · Trans-NIH Research Support$3.2M7.1%
  4. 93.867 · Vision Research$2.6M5.9%
  5. 93.307 · Minority Health and Health Disparities Research$1.4M3.2%
  6. 93.969 · Pphf Geriatric Education Centers$1M2.3%
  7. 93.847 · Diabetes, Digestive, and Kidney Diseases Extramural Research$757.5K1.7%
  8. 93.359 · Nurse Education, Practice Quality and Retention Grants$753.3K1.7%

Awarding agencies

  1. Department of Health and Human Services
  2. Department of Health and Human Services

Largest awards

  1. 93.310 · Trans-NIH Research Support· National Institutes of Health· Direct payment for specified use· Sep 17, 2021 – Aug 17, 2026· OT2OD032581
  2. 93.866 · Aging Research· National Institutes of Health· Cooperative agreement· Sep 22, 2022 – Sep 10, 2026· U19AG078109
  3. 93.866 · Aging Research· National Institutes of Health· Project grant· Feb 3, 2021 – Jun 2, 2026· R01AG058533
  4. 93.307 · Minority Health and Health Disparities Research· National Institutes of Health· Project grant· Jun 18, 2021 – Jun 23, 2026· S21MD012472
  5. 93.879 · Medical Library Assistance· National Institutes of Health· Cooperative agreement· Oct 22, 2020 – Sep 10, 2026· UG4LM012345
  6. 93.928 · Special Projects of National Significance· Health Resources and Services Administration· Project grant· Jul 24, 2025 – Sep 23, 2026· U9055065

Source: Federal financial assistance transactions (Financial Assistance Broker Submission) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · FY2021–FY2026.

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

  • Sub-grants: $212.4K (2 subawards)

2 sub-recipients

  1. SAN ANTONIO, TX · 1 subaward
  2. HOUSTON, TX · 1 subaward

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-grants: $4.1M (10 subawards)

9 primes

  1. PITTSBURGH, PA · 1 subaward
  2. HOUSTON, TX · 1 subaward
  3. KINGSTON, RI · 1 subaward
  4. NEW ORLEANS, LA · 1 subaward
  5. EVANSTON, IL · 2 subawards
  6. OKLAHOMA CITY, OK · 1 subaward
  7. ANN ARBOR, MI · 1 subaward
  8. DALLAS, TX · 1 subaward
  9. LOS ANGELES, CA · 1 subaward

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $6.5M paid out · $3.8M received
  • FY2022: $1.6M paid out · $8M received
  • FY2023: $37.4M paid out · $3.4M received
  • FY2024: $5.3M paid out · $2.6M received
  • FY2025: $2.3M paid out · $3.2M received
  • FY2026: $212.4K paid out · $4.1M received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

57 companies · $53.3M reported

  1. LOS ANGELES, CA · 5 subawards
  2. MADISON, WI · 1 subaward
  3. WASHINGTON, DC · 1 subaward

Primes that pay it

47 companies · $25.2M reported

  1. PITTSBURGH, PA · 13 subawards
  2. AUSTIN, TX · 3 subawards
  3. ANN ARBOR, MI · 4 subawards

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 7 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. MANSFIELD, TX · 96% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveFederal Prison System / Bureau of Prisons · General medical and surgical hospitals
  2. UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY$89M+27% in FY2026
    LEXINGTON, KY · 4 entities · 81% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveFederal Prison System / Bureau of Prisons · General medical and surgical hospitalsNational Institutes of Health · Scientific research and development services
  3. MAYO CLINIC$98.5M+17% in FY2026
    ROCHESTER, MN · 7 entities · 74% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveFederal Prison System / Bureau of Prisons · General medical and surgical hospitals

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Across the company family of THE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER AT FORT WORTH (2 recipients).

Matched organizations

  • University of North Texas Health Science CenterAI match · 100%
Lobbying · 2024
$0
3 reports

Lobbying by year

  1. 2024$0
    3 reports

Top issues

Who was contacted

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

  1. TENAGRITY SOLUTIONS, LLC$0
    3 reports

Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: Analisa AI name judgments (entity-match@1), updated Oct 5, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026.