Federal contractor · MOBILE, AL

THOMPSON ENGINEERING, INC.

THOMPSON ENGINEERING, INC. received $1.3M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 3 awards (−83% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $50.1M. Its largest customer was Department of the Army ($1.3M).

Obligations · FY2026
$1.3M
New awards
3
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
KK91UMNN6RM8
Other than small business
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 1.1MFY2017
  2. 2.1MFY2018
  3. 3.1MFY2019
  4. 2.7MFY2020
  5. 4.2MFY2021
  6. 9.2MFY2022
  7. 6.3MFY2023
  8. 12.2MFY2024
  9. 7.9MFY2025
  10. 1.3MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Department of the Army$1.3M100%
    3 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Construction & real property$1.3M100%

Where the work was performed

  1. Bay County, FL$908.5K69%
  2. Montgomery County, AL$405K31%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition0.0%
    US 39% · $0
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.8% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. BASE YEAR TO PROVIDE CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT SERVICES TO TYNDALL AREA OFFICE TYNDALL AFB, FL.$2.2M
    Department of the Army· Bay County, FL· Construction & real property· Dec 12, 2023 – Dec 19, 2025· W9127824F0016
  2. CM SERVICES SOUTH ALABAMA AREA OFFICE MAXWELL AFB, AL$1.9M
    Department of the Army· Montgomery County, AL· Construction & real property· Nov 17, 2023 – Jan 7, 2026· W9127824F0008
  3. PROVIDE CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT SERVICES TO TYNDALL AREA OFFICE TYNDALL AFB, FL$1.3M
    Department of the Army· Bay County, FL· Construction & real property· Apr 2, 2024 – Apr 30, 2026· W9127824F0068

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 1 market (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. SYSTEMS TECHNOLOGY & RESEARCH, INC$21.6M−20% in FY2026
    HUNTSVILLE, AL · 100% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. BURNS & MCDONNELL + GROUP 70 HO'OHUI'IA JOINT VENTURE$21.8M−95% in FY2026
    HONOLULU, HI · 100% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. BIO RESPONSE SOLUTIONS INC$22M
    DANVILLE, IN · 100% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026.