Federal contractor · BIRMINGHAM, AL

THOMPSON TRACTOR CO INC

THOMPSON TRACTOR CO INC received -$30K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 6 awards (−105% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $7.3M. Its largest customer was Department of the Navy ($11K).

Obligations · FY2026
-$30K
New awards
6
Sole-source
—
Single offer
—
UEI
UEGYV7DDP1X4
Other than small businessWoman-owned

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 441.1KFY2017
  2. 886.4KFY2018
  3. 1.2MFY2019
  4. 824.2KFY2020
  5. 1.6MFY2021
  6. 1.2MFY2022
  7. 224.6KFY2023
  8. 382.5KFY2024
  9. 635.1KFY2025
  10. -30KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 1 awards
  2. 1 awards
  3. 1 awards
  4. 2 awards
  5. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Professional services$11K77%
  2. Equipment maintenance$3,23023%

Where the work was performed

  1. Dale County, AL$4,3680.0%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. Department of Defense · 1 awards
  2. Department of the Interior · 1 awards

Largest awards

  1. Department of the Army· Calhoun County, AL· Other equipment & supplies· Sep 30, 2025 – Dec 22, 2025· W519TC25CA058
  2. Department of the Air Force· Jefferson County, AL· Other equipment & supplies· Aug 28, 2024 – May 26, 2026· FA452824P0128
  3. Department of Veterans Affairs· Jefferson County, AL· Equipment maintenance· May 11, 2020 – Oct 21, 2025· 36C24720C0157
  4. Department of the Air Force· Okaloosa County, FL· Equipment maintenance· Mar 25, 2026 – Mar 25, 2026· FA282326F0038
  5. Department of the Navy· Jefferson County, AL· Professional services· Mar 18, 2026 – Mar 18, 2026· N6133126P0084
  6. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service· Dale County, AL· Equipment maintenance· Dec 18, 2025 – Dec 18, 2025· 140FS326P0021

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $145.5K (2 subawards)

2 primes

  1. ANNISTON, AL · 1 subaward
  2. BIRMINGHAM, AL · 1 subaward

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $0 paid out · $2.7M received
  • FY2022: $0 paid out · $1.7M received
  • FY2023: $0 paid out · $1.8M received
  • FY2024: $0 paid out · $1.7M received
  • FY2025: $0 paid out · $39.9M received
  • FY2026: $0 paid out · $145.5K received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

14 companies · $48M reported

  1. SERCO INC$39.2M
    HERNDON, VA · 1 subaward · Nonresidential building construction
  2. YORK, PA · 37 subawards · Semiconductor and other electronic component manufacturing
  3. BIRMINGHAM, AL · 10 subawards · Nonresidential building construction

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 10 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. MOHAWK INDUSTRIAL WERKS LLC$479.5K−100% in FY2026
    QUEENSBURY, NY · 48% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Other general purpose machinery manufacturing
  2. YATES INDUSTRIES SOUTH LLC$480.2K−100% in FY2026
    DECATUR, AL · 48% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Other general purpose machinery manufacturing
  3. ARMIL/CFS, INC.$602.5K+2,191% in FY2026
    SOUTH HOLLAND, IL · 48% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Other general purpose machinery manufacturing

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.