Federal contractor · MC LEAN, VA

THREE WIRE SYSTEMS, LLC

THREE WIRE SYSTEMS, LLC received $2M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 3 awards (−85% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $731.1M. Its largest customer was Department of the Army ($1.6M).

Obligations · FY2026
$2M
New awards
3
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
82%
UEI
U8H9F5MLU957
Small businessVeteran-ownedService-disabled veteran-owned

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 77.5MFY2017
  2. 87MFY2018
  3. 100.5MFY2019
  4. 147.8MFY2020
  5. 111.7MFY2021
  6. 78.7MFY2022
  7. 65.5MFY2023
  8. 47.1MFY2024
  9. 13.3MFY2025
  10. 2MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 1 awards
  2. 2 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. IT & telecom$2M100%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition82%
    US 39% · $1.6M
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions82%
    US 8.8% · $1.6M
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. Department of the Army· Bexar County, TX· IT & telecom· Jan 23, 2026 – Jan 23, 2026· W9124J26FA017
  2. Federal Labor Relations Authority· District of Columbia, DC· IT & telecom· Sep 25, 2025 – Jul 17, 2026· 54310325F00019
  3. Federal Labor Relations Authority· District of Columbia, DC· IT & telecom· Mar 26, 2026 – Mar 26, 2026· 54310326F00007

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $0 paid out · $5.9M received
  • FY2022: $0 paid out · $2.2M received
  • FY2023: $0 paid out · $10.8M received
  • FY2024: $0 paid out · $3.9M received
  • FY2025: $0 paid out · $126.1K received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

10 companies · $22.9M reported

  1. RESTON, VA · 2 subawards · Computer systems design and related services
  2. ARLINGTON, VA · 2 subawards · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services
  3. ATLANTA, GA · 1 subaward · Scientific research and development services

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 48 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. IADEPTIVE TECHNOLOGIES LLC$13.8M+109% in FY2026
    ELLICOTT CITY, MD · 21% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveCenters for Medicare and Medicaid Services · Computer systems design and related servicesOffice of the Assistant Secretary for Financial Resources · Computer systems design and related services
  2. METTLE SOLUTIONS LLC$24.6M+11% in FY2026
    COLUMBIA, MD · 23% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveCenters for Medicare and Medicaid Services · Computer systems design and related servicesOffice of the Assistant Secretary for Financial Resources · Computer systems design and related servicesNational Institutes of Health · Computer systems design and related services
  3. TRILLION ERP VENTURETECH, LLC$34M−17% in FY2026
    RESTON, VA · 25% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveCenters for Medicare and Medicaid Services · Computer systems design and related servicesDefense Information Systems Agency · Computer systems design and related servicesOffices, Boards and Divisions · Computer systems design and related services+1 more

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026.