Federal contractor · WESTLAKE, OH

THUNDERYARD SOLUTIONS LLC

THUNDERYARD SOLUTIONS LLC received $22.3M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 2 awards. Its largest customer was Department of Veterans Affairs ($20.7M).

Obligations · FY2026
$22.3M
New awards
2
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
7.1%
UEI
KVN6RKMNNJX4
Small businessVeteran-ownedService-disabled veteran-owned

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

Part of the BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON INC company family: 31 registered entities, $6.2B in FY2026 together. See the family

  1. BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON INCMCLEAN, VA · Family page
    $5.6B
  2. $466M
  3. $77.7M
  4. $13.7M
  5. BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON INC.ANNAPOLIS JUNCTION, MD
    $10.2M

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 22.3MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. IT & telecom$20.7M93%
  2. Professional services$1.6M7.1%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition7.1%
    US 39% · $1.6M
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions7.1%
    US 8.8% · $1.6M
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. Department of Veterans Affairs· Cuyahoga County, OH· IT & telecom· Jul 29, 2026 – Sep 23, 2026· 36C10B26F0237
  2. · Cuyahoga County, OH· Professional services· Jul 24, 2026 – Jul 24, 2026· 2099AC26F00005

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $39.4M (16 subawards)

2 primes

  1. MCLEAN, VA · 5 subawards
  2. EATONTOWN, NJ · 11 subawards

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $0 paid out · $586K received
  • FY2022: $0 paid out · $1.3M received
  • FY2023: $0 paid out · $22.1M received
  • FY2024: $0 paid out · $7.3M received
  • FY2025: $0 paid out · $11M received
  • FY2026: $0 paid out · $39.4M received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

2,165 companies · $13.3B reported

  1. ARLINGTON, VA · 92 subawards · Computer systems design and related services
  2. VIENNA, VA · 176 subawards · Computer systems design and related services
  3. SAINT PETERSBURG, FL · 52 subawards · Computer systems design and related services

Primes that pay it

122 companies · $1.6B reported

  1. CHANTILLY, VA · 7 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. CHANTILLY, VA · 7 subawards · Computer systems design and related services
  3. FAIRFAX, VA · 13 subawards · Computer systems design and related services

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 134 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. RESTON, VA · 31 entities · 36% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveFederal Acquisition Service · Architectural, engineering, and related servicesNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related servicesFederal Acquisition Service · Computer systems design and related services+12 more
  2. CACI, INC. - FEDERAL$13.2B−26% in FY2026
    CHANTILLY, VA · 67 entities · 35% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveFederal Acquisition Service · Computer systems design and related servicesNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related servicesFederal Acquisition Service · Architectural, engineering, and related services+11 more
  3. PERATON ENTERPRISE SOLUTIONS LLC$13.4B−8.6% in FY2026
    CHANTILLY, VA · 60 entities · 28% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveFederal Acquisition Service · Computer systems design and related servicesFederal Acquisition Service · Architectural, engineering, and related servicesNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related services+14 more

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Across the company family of BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON INC (31 recipients).

Matched organizations

  • BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON INC.AI match · 100%
Lobbying · 2025
$2.4M
28 reports
Lobbying · 2023–2026
$6M
$6M in its own reports
PAC giving · 2026
$195.5K
1 PAC

Lobbying by year

  1. 2023$620K
    16 reports
  2. 2024$1.7M
    19 reports
  3. 2025$2.4M
    28 reports
  4. 2026$1.3M
    14 reports

Top issues

  1. Government issues53 reports
  2. Defense45 reports
  3. Homeland security34 reports
  4. Science and technology25 reports
  5. Budget and appropriations22 reports
  6. Intelligence and surveillance19 reports
  7. Veterans19 reports
  8. Transportation14 reports

Who was contacted

  1. U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES71 reports
  2. U.S. SENATE62 reports

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

  1. AKIN GUMP STRAUSS HAUER & FELD$700K
    14 reports
  2. INNOVATIVE FEDERAL STRATEGIES, LLC$640K
    14 reports
  3. BALLARD PARTNERS$570K
    7 reports
  4. Monument Advocacy$450K
    14 reports
  5. The Nickles Group, LLC$400K
    7 reports
  6. LGL Advisors LLC$110K
    3 reports
  7. Etherton and Associates, Inc.$100K
    3 reports
  8. TheGROUP DC, LLC$80K
    1 reports

Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

PAC giving to candidates by party, 2026 cycle

  1. Republican$103.5K53%
  2. Democratic$92K47%

PACs sponsored

  • BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON INC. PAC (BOOZ ALLEN PAC)$391.4K raised this cycle

PACs these organizations sponsor (connected organizations in FEC records). A PAC gives employees' and members' voluntary contributions, not the company's own money.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 5, 2026, loaded Oct 5, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 5, 2026, loaded Oct 5, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: Analisa AI name judgments (entity-match@1), updated Oct 5, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026.