Federal contractor · EL SEGUNDO, CA

TIME WARNER CABLE INC.

TIME WARNER CABLE INC. received -$400 in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 1 awards (−102% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $492.9K. Its largest customer was Defense Information Systems Agency (-$400).

Obligations · FY2026
-$400
New awards
1
Sole-source
—
Single offer
—
UEI
CCDDZMJVD643
Parent company
CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
Other than small business
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

Part of the CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS OPERATING LLC company family: 13 registered entities, $5.4M in FY2026 together. See the family

  1. CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS OPERATING LLCSAINT LOUIS, MO · Family page
    $5M
  2. TIME WARNER CABLE ENTERPRISES LLCSAINT LOUIS, MO
    $148.6K
  3. CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS OPERATING, LLCSAINT LOUIS, MO
    $130.5K
  4. CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS OPERATING, LLCRENO, NV
    $113.6K
  5. BRESNAN BROADBAND OF MONTANA, LLCBILLINGS, MT
    $2,824

AI-inferred: entity-match@1 · Analisa AI · 2026-10-05

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 149.2KFY2017
  2. -2.6KFY2018
  3. 67.9KFY2019
  4. 9.2KFY2020
  5. 38.4KFY2021
  6. 144KFY2022
  7. 32.2KFY2023
  8. 36KFY2024
  9. 19KFY2025
  10. -400FY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Defense Information Systems Agency-$4000.0%
    1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

Largest awards

  1. TWCI000002EBM - 2.5GB WAVE SERVICE$206.5K
    Defense Information Systems Agency· Los Angeles County, CA· IT & telecom· May 31, 2017 – Feb 3, 2026· HC101313M0421

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

6 companies · $33.8M reported

  1. STATE OF INDIANA$23.8M
    INDIANAPOLIS, IN · 1 subaward
  2. STATE OF MISSOURI$9.2M
    JEFFERSON CITY, MO · 2 subawards
  3. ELECTRIC BOAT CORPORATION$331.3K
    GROTON, CT · 2 subawards · Computer systems design and related services

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 70 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. N-OVATION TECHNOLOGY GROUP LLC$9.8M+26% in FY2026
    DAYTON, OH · 26% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveVeterans Affairs · Wired telecommunications carriersArmy · Wired telecommunications carriersVeterans Affairs · Wired and wireless telecommunications carriers+4 more
  2. COMCAST BUSINESS COMMUNICATIONS, LLC$11.1M−29% in FY2026
    PHILADELPHIA, PA · 30 entities · 24% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveVeterans Affairs · Wired telecommunications carriersVeterans Affairs · NAICS 5152Drug Enforcement Administration · Wired telecommunications carriers+7 more
  3. HAWAIIAN TELCOM, INC.$7M−91% in FY2026
    HONOLULU, HI · 4 entities · 19% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Wired telecommunications carriersArmy · Wired and wireless telecommunications carriersVeterans Affairs · Wired and wireless telecommunications carriers+5 more

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Across the company family of CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS OPERATING LLC (13 recipients).

Matched organizations

  • CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS INC.AI match · 100%
  • Charter Communications Operating, LLCAI match · 100%
Lobbying · 2025
$10.5M
94 reports
Lobbying · 2023–2026
$36.7M
$36.7M in its own reports
PAC giving · 2026
$1.3M
1 PAC

Lobbying by year

  1. 2023$10.4M
    89 reports
  2. 2024$10.9M
    97 reports
  3. 2025$10.5M
    94 reports
  4. 2026$5M
    46 reports

Top issues

  1. Telecommunications218 reports
  2. Communications, broadcasting, radio and TV108 reports
  3. Taxation and the Internal Revenue Code73 reports
  4. Copyright, patent and trademark15 reports
  5. Defense14 reports
  6. Budget and appropriations11 reports
  7. Agriculture8 reports
  8. Government issues3 reports

Who was contacted

  1. U.S. SENATE317 reports
  2. U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES308 reports
  3. Federal Communications Commission (FCC)40 reports
  4. White House Office38 reports
  5. Executive Office of the President (EOP)33 reports
  6. Commerce - Dept of (DOC)31 reports
  7. Agriculture - Dept of (USDA)22 reports
  8. Federal Trade Commission (FTC)17 reports
  9. Natl Economic Council (NEC)17 reports
  10. Office of Science & Technology Policy (OSTP)15 reports

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

  1. Fierce Government Relations$1.1M
    14 reports
  2. Capitol Tax Partners, LLP$840K
    14 reports
  3. POLARIS GOVERNMENT RELATIONS, LLC$840K
    14 reports
  4. ELEVATE GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS, LLC$840K
    14 reports
  5. Venture Government Strategies, LLC (fka Hobart Hallaway & Quayle Ventures, LLC)$810K
    14 reports
  6. Penn Avenue Partners$740K
    14 reports
  7. Cassidy & Associates, Inc.$720K
    14 reports
  8. Empire Consulting Group$700K
    14 reports

29 firms in all. Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

PAC giving to candidates by party, 2026 cycle

  1. Republican$650.5K51%
  2. Democratic$618.5K49%
  3. Other or none$1,5000.1%

PACs sponsored

  • CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS INC. POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE$2.6M raised this cycle

PACs these organizations sponsor (connected organizations in FEC records). A PAC gives employees' and members' voluntary contributions, not the company's own money.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: Analisa AI name judgments (entity-match@1), updated Sep 30, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026.