Federal contractor · TAMPA, FL

TMPC INC

TMPC INC received $3.9M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 8 awards (+71% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $47M. Its largest customer was U.S. Special Operations Command ($2.1M).

Obligations · FY2026
$3.9M
New awards
8
Sole-source
61%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
UX6XA5HES291
Small businessVeteran-ownedService-disabled veteran-ownedMinority-owned8(a) program

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 0FY2017
  2. 3.1MFY2018
  3. 13.9MFY2019
  4. 10.4MFY2020
  5. 4.7MFY2021
  6. 3.2MFY2022
  7. 2.5MFY2023
  8. 3.1MFY2024
  9. 2.3MFY2025
  10. 3.9MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 2 awards
  2. 1 awards
  3. 3 awards
  4. 1 awards
  5. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Professional services$2.5M65%
  2. IT & telecom$870K22%
  3. Facilities & utilities$491.4K13%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition61%
    US 39% · $2.4M
  • Sole-source awards61%
    US 30% · $2.4M
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.8% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. U.S. Special Operations Command· Hillsborough County, FL· IT & telecom· Jun 26, 2024 – May 21, 2026· H9241524C0007
  2. U.S. Special Operations Command· Hillsborough County, FL· Professional services· Sep 29, 2025 – Nov 24, 2025· H9240025CE005
  3. Under Secretary for Farm and Foreign Agricultural Services· Lancaster County, NE· Professional services· Aug 20, 2026 – Sep 9, 2026· 12FPC126F0123
  4. Department of the Navy· Orange County, FL· Equipment maintenance· Jun 12, 2025 – Nov 13, 2025· N6134025P0034
  5. Department of the Navy· Orange County, FL· IT & telecom· Mar 27, 2025 – Jun 10, 2026· N6134025P0025
  6. Department of the Navy· Charleston County, SC· Facilities & utilities· Apr 27, 2026 – Apr 27, 2026· N6523626FE154
  7. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration· Hillsborough County, FL· Professional services· Sep 11, 2026 – Sep 11, 2026· 1333MF26F0065
  8. Office of Procurement Operations· Hillsborough County, FL· Professional services· Sep 28, 2026 – Sep 28, 2026· 70RCSJ26FR0000063

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

1 company · $4.5M reported

  1. GROTON, CT · 2 subawards · Computer systems design and related services

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 8 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. SAN ANTONIO, TX · 61% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveU.S. Special Operations Command · Computer systems design and related services
  2. HORIZON PERFORMANCE L.L.C.$7M−33% in FY2026
    RALEIGH, NC · 61% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveU.S. Special Operations Command · Computer systems design and related services
  3. COPPERHEAD TECHNOLOGIES LLC$7.1M+19% in FY2026
    MASHANTUCKET, CT · 61% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveU.S. Special Operations Command · Computer systems design and related services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Matched organizations

  • TMPC Inc.AI match · 99%
Lobbying · 2025
$200K
4 reports
Lobbying · 2023–2026
$580K

Lobbying by year

  1. 2023$80K
    2 reports
  2. 2024$200K
    4 reports
  3. 2025$200K
    4 reports
  4. 2026$100K
    2 reports

Top issues

  1. Government issues12 reports

Who was contacted

  1. U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES12 reports
  2. U.S. SENATE12 reports

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

  1. Ervin Graves Strategy Group, LLC$580K
    12 reports

Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: AI name judgments (entity-match@1, jev-1.13.0), updated Sep 30, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026.