Federal contractor · LITTLE ROCK, AR

TOBACCO CONTROL BOARD ARKANSAS

TOBACCO CONTROL BOARD ARKANSAS received -$660.9K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 3 awards (−168% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $5M. Its largest customer was Food and Drug Administration (-$660.9K).

Obligations · FY2026
-$660.9K
New awards
3
Sole-source
—
Single offer
—
UEI
DA1RX2974AG6
Other than small businessGovernment entity
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 861.3KFY2017
  2. 889.3KFY2018
  3. 927.4KFY2019
  4. 146.7KFY2020
  5. -653KFY2021
  6. 931.4KFY2022
  7. 952.1KFY2023
  8. 681.1KFY2024
  9. 970.6KFY2025
  10. -660.9KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Food and Drug Administration-$660.9K0.0%
    3 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. Food and Drug Administration-$660.9K
    Department of Health and Human Services · 1 awards

Largest awards

  1. CONDUCT INSPECTIONS OF RETAILERS THAT SELL AND ADVERTISE ANY REGULATED TOBACCO PRODUCTS TO DETERMINE COMPLIANCE AND SUBMIT INSPECTION RESULTS TO FDA.$2M
    Food and Drug Administration· Pulaski County, AR· Professional services· Sep 17, 2020 – Nov 5, 2025· 75F40120C00144
  2. THIS TASK ORDER REQUIREMENT WILL SUPPORT THE FDA PROGRAM ENTITLED STATE TOBACCO RETAIL COMPLIANCE CHECK INSPECTIONS.$979.2K
    Food and Drug Administration· Pulaski County, AR· Professional services· May 28, 2026 – May 28, 2026· 75F40126F19003
  3. ARKANSAS - TOBACCO INSPECTION AND COMPLIANCE REQUIREMENT$431.8K
    Food and Drug Administration· Pulaski County, AR· Professional services· Sep 28, 2024 – Jul 28, 2026· 75F40124F19001

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 1 market (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. AGRICULTURE, MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF$1M−30% in FY2026
    SAINT PAUL, MN · 100.0% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveFood and Drug Administration · Administration of human resource programs
  2. ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE LAWS ENFORCEMENT COMMISSION$957.7K+28% in FY2026
    OKLAHOMA CITY, OK · 97% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveFood and Drug Administration · Administration of human resource programs
  3. FOOD & AGRICULTURE, CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF$883K−19% in FY2026
    SACRAMENTO, CA · 2 entities · 87% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveFood and Drug Administration · Administration of human resource programs

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026.