Federal contractor · ANCHORAGE, AK

TOGIAK MANAGEMENT SERVICES, LLC

TOGIAK MANAGEMENT SERVICES, LLC received $14.6M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 16 awards (−26% vs FY2025). Since FY2021: $119.3M. Its largest customer was Department of the Navy ($12.6M).

Obligations · FY2026
$14.6M
New awards
16
Sole-source
100%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
GQNPLL9NKHA5
Small businessMinority-owned8(a) programNative-owned

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 1.7MFY2021
  2. 23MFY2022
  3. 19MFY2023
  4. 41.3MFY2024
  5. 19.8MFY2025
  6. 14.6MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 4 awards
  2. 6 awards
  3. 2 awards
  4. 1 awards
  5. 3 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Professional services$11.8M81%
  2. Construction & real property$2.3M15%
  3. Equipment maintenance$570.1K3.9%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition100%
    US 39% · $14.6M
  • Sole-source awards100%
    US 30% · $14.6M
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.7% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. Department of Defense · 3 awards
  2. Department of Defense · 3 awards

Largest awards

  1. Department of the Navy· Ocean County, NJ· Professional services· Jan 21, 2026 – Jan 21, 2026· N6833526F0459
  2. DO 0003$5.8M
    Department of the Navy· Anchorage Municipality, AK· Professional services· Nov 19, 2024 – Nov 20, 2025· N6833525F0060
  3. Department of the Air Force· Anchorage Municipality, AK· Equipment maintenance· May 18, 2022 – May 29, 2026· FA251822F0020
  4. Department of the Air Force· Kern County, CA· Construction & real property· Aug 26, 2024 – Apr 27, 2026· FA930124F0137
  5. Department of the Navy· Ocean County, NJ· Professional services· Nov 24, 2025 – Jan 21, 2026· N6833526F0434
  6. Defense Logistics Agency· Kitsap County, WA· Professional services· Dec 15, 2023 – Nov 25, 2025· SP470324C0003
  7. ORDER$1.9M
    Department of the Navy· Anchorage Municipality, AK· Professional services· Apr 16, 2026 – Apr 16, 2026· N6833526F0506
  8. Department of the Air Force· Kern County, CA· Construction & real property· Jan 21, 2026 – Jan 21, 2026· FA930126F0042

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

1 company · $686.8K reported

  1. CENTREVILLE, VA · 1 subaward · Other professional, scientific, and technical services

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 12 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. METRO PAVING CORP$26.5M−84% in FY2026
    HYATTSVILLE, MD · 25% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Other heavy and civil engineering constructionArmy · Utility system construction
  2. DEXTER, MO · 25% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Other heavy and civil engineering constructionArmy · Utility system construction
  3. COLORADO SPRINGS, CO · 27% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Employment services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.