Federal contractor · TOUGALOO, MS

TOUGALOO COLLEGE

TOUGALOO COLLEGE received $1.5M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 1 awards (+2.6% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $12.2M. Its largest customer was National Institutes of Health ($1.5M). It also received $9.9M in federal grants and other assistance in FY2026.

Obligations · FY2026
$1.5M
New awards
1
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
XELUC5A4AJQ7
Other than small businessEducational institution

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 1.3MFY2017
  2. 1.2MFY2018
  3. 1.2MFY2019
  4. 1.3MFY2020
  5. 1.1MFY2021
  6. 1.1MFY2022
  7. 2.7MFY2023
  8. -442.4KFY2024
  9. 1.4MFY2025
  10. 1.5MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Research & development$1.5M100%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition0.0%
    US 39% · $0
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.7% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. National Institutes of Health· Montgomery County, MD· Research & development· Sep 15, 2025 – Sep 3, 2026· 75N92025F00001

Federal grants & assistance received

Grants, loans (counted at their subsidy cost), direct payments and insurance, by fiscal year of the action (USAspending.gov, FABS). Reported apart from contracts and never added to them.

TOUGALOO COLLEGE received $9.9M in federal assistance in FY2026, on 82 actions (5 new awards), −56% vs FY2025. Its largest program was 84.031 · Higher Education Institutional Aid ($4.6M).

Assistance · FY2026
$9.9M
New awards
5
Actions
82
Since FY2021
$102.2M

Assistance by fiscal year

  1. 21.5MFY2021
  2. 11.1MFY2022
  3. 12.8MFY2023
  4. 24.6MFY2024
  5. 22.2MFY2025
  6. 9.9MFY2026

By type

  1. Grants$7.2M73%
  2. Direct payments$2.7M27%

Top programs

  1. 84.031 · Higher Education Institutional Aid$4.6M46%
  2. 84.063 · Federal Pell Grant Program$2.2M22%
  3. 84.047 · Trio Upward Bound$1.1M11%
  4. 93.926 · Healthy Start Initiative$1M10%
  5. 93.110 · Special Projects of Regional and National Significance$444.1K4.5%
  6. 84.033 · Federal Work-Study Program$261.8K2.7%
  7. 84.007 · Federal Supplemental Educational Opportunity Grants$198.9K2.0%
  8. 47.083 · Integrative Activities$120.9K1.2%

Awarding agencies

  1. Department of Health and Human Services

Largest awards

  1. 84.031 · Higher Education Institutional Aid· Department of Education· Project grant· Aug 3, 2022 – Aug 29, 2026· P031B220075
  2. 93.926 · Healthy Start Initiative· Health Resources and Services Administration· Project grant· Feb 18, 2021 – Jun 4, 2026· H4900158
  3. 93.352 · Construction Support· National Institutes of Health· Project grant· Sep 19, 2024 – Sep 15, 2026· C06OD037837
  4. 84.047 · Trio Upward Bound· Department of Education· Project grant· May 23, 2022 – Jul 28, 2026· P047A220594
  5. 84.063 · Federal Pell Grant Program· Department of Education· Direct payment for specified use· Aug 19, 2024 – Jul 24, 2026· P063P241721
  6. 84.063 · Federal Pell Grant Program· Department of Education· Direct payment for specified use· Apr 24, 2023 – Jun 18, 2026· P063P231721

Source: Federal financial assistance transactions (Financial Assistance Broker Submission) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 8, 2026, loaded Oct 8, 2026 · FY2021–FY2026.

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-grants: $466.3K (2 subawards)

2 primes

  1. LINCOLN, NE · 1 subaward
  2. BOSTON, MA · 1 subaward

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $0 paid out · $314.2K received
  • FY2022: $0 paid out · $334.8K received
  • FY2023: $0 paid out · $613.8K received
  • FY2024: $0 paid out · $519.5K received
  • FY2025: $0 paid out · $430K received
  • FY2026: $0 paid out · $466.3K received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

6 companies · $2.7M reported

  1. JACKSON, MS · 4 subawards
  2. BOSTON, MA · 4 subawards
  3. LINCOLN, NE · 1 subaward

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 1 market (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. MPF/CAMRIS SOLUTIONS, LLC$2.5M+3% in FY2026
    GAITHERSBURG, MD · 100.0% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNational Institutes of Health · Scientific research and development services
  2. NEW YORK, NY · 100.0% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNational Institutes of Health · Scientific research and development services
  3. NEWTON, MA · 98% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNational Institutes of Health · Scientific research and development services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Matched organizations

  • Tougaloo CollegeAI match · 100%
Lobbying · 2023
$70K
4 reports
Lobbying · 2023–2024
$75K

Lobbying by year

  1. 2023$70K
    4 reports
  2. 2024$5,000
    2 reports

Top issues

  1. Education6 reports

Who was contacted

  1. U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES6 reports
  2. U.S. SENATE6 reports

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

  1. JOHN LADD & ASSOCIATES, INC.$75K
    6 reports

Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: Analisa AI name judgments (entity-match@1), updated Oct 5, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.