Federal contractor · UPPER MARLBORO, MD

TRI-LOGISTICS LLC

TRI-LOGISTICS LLC received $40.6K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 31 awards (−98% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $20.9M. Its largest customer was Department of the Air Force ($141.9K).

Obligations · FY2026
$40.6K
New awards
31
Sole-source
100%
Single offer
16%
UEI
L6CLBRMHNFP9
Small businessWoman-ownedVeteran-ownedService-disabled veteran-ownedMinority-owned8(a) program
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 1MFY2017
  2. 1.8MFY2018
  3. 1.1MFY2019
  4. 3.7MFY2020
  5. 816.1KFY2021
  6. 1.3MFY2022
  7. 2.4MFY2023
  8. 6.8MFY2024
  9. 2MFY2025
  10. 40.6KFY2026
  11. 0FY2027

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Department of the Air Force$141.9K100%
    5 awards
  2. Federal Acquisition Service$15.7K39%
    21 awards
  3. Federal Bureau of Investigation$6,55816%
    1 awards
  4. Department of the Navy-$1,4340.0%
    1 awards
  5. Federal Aviation Administration-$122.1K0.0%
    3 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Other equipment & supplies$51.8K100%

Where the work was performed

  1. Middlesex County, MA$150.8K100%
  2. Providence County, RI$15K37%
  3. Prince George's County, MD$5,55414%
  4. Muskogee County, OK$2,2015.4%
  5. Escambia County, FL$1,2743.1%
  6. Suffolk County, MA$9722.4%
  7. Cleveland County, OK$9062.2%
  8. Flathead County, MT$6021.5%
  9. DuPage County, IL$5091.3%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition100%
    US 39% · $115.5K
  • Sole-source awards100%
    US 30% · $108.9K
  • Single-offer competitions16%
    US 8.8% · $6,558
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. Department of the Air Force$150.8K
    Department of Defense · 1 awards
  2. Federal Acquisition Service$15.7K
    General Services Administration · 3 awards

Largest awards

  1. AWARD TO 0002$3.7M
    Federal Aviation Administration· District of Columbia, DC· Other equipment & supplies· Mar 21, 2017 – Aug 22, 2026· 0002
  2. AWARD OF TO 0002$1.1M
    Federal Aviation Administration· District of Columbia, DC· Other equipment & supplies· Mar 20, 2017 – Sep 11, 2026· DTFAWA16D00040CALL0002
  3. AWARD TO 0002$542.2K
    Federal Aviation Administration· District of Columbia, DC· Other equipment & supplies· Mar 21, 2017 – Aug 22, 2026· 0002
  4. THIS PROJECT ENCOMPASSES THE PROCUREMENT, INSTALLATION, PROJECT MANAGEMENT AND DESIGN SERVICES NECESSARY TO ADDRESS REQUIREMENTS IDENTIFIED DURING THE ONGOING 2ND FLOOR RENOVATIONS OF BUILDING 1607, HANSCOM AFB, MA AS OUTLINED IN THE SOW.$517.3K
    Department of the Air Force· Middlesex County, MA· Construction & real property· Sep 4, 2025 – Feb 19, 2026· FA283525P0046
  5. RFID ASSET TRACKING SYSTEM$376.9K
    Department of the Navy· Arlington County, VA· IT & telecom· Mar 16, 2021 – Feb 2, 2026· N0001421C4006
  6. AU BLDG. 800 HALLWAY PROJECT$223.1K
    Department of the Air Force· Montgomery County, AL· Equipment maintenance· Sep 22, 2025 – Mar 4, 2026· FA330025P0182
  7. THIS REQUIREMENT IS TO ACQUIRE AND INSTALL NEW CUBICLE FURNITURE TO ACCOMMODATE PERSONNEL FROM THE AFLCMC/WVG ORGANIZATION WITH ~1,900 SQ. FOOT OFFICE SPACE.$151.7K
    Department of the Air Force· Middlesex County, MA· Other equipment & supplies· Jun 11, 2026 – Jun 11, 2026· FA283526P0025
  8. DELIVERY ORDER #47QSMA24F0053, ASSIST ID 47QSMA22K0020-0018, IS ISSUED TO TRI-LOGISTICS FOR $36,008.16. QUOTE DATED 7/23/24 WAS SUBMITTED AS OUTLINED IN THE AWARDED SHELVING IDIQ TO PROVIDE SHELVING & ANCILLARY SERVICES FOR THE JEH 1B223 PROJECT.$35.6K
    Federal Acquisition Service· Prince George's County, MD· Other equipment & supplies· Aug 15, 2024 – Feb 4, 2026· 47QSMA24F0053

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $46.8K (1 subaward)

1 prime

  1. MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY$46.8K100%
    LEXINGTON, MA · 1 subaward

By fiscal year

  • FY2022: $0 paid out · $55.3K received
  • FY2023: $0 paid out · $411.9K received
  • FY2024: $0 paid out · $693K received
  • FY2025: $0 paid out · $539.7K received
  • FY2026: $0 paid out · $46.8K received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

1 company · $1.7M reported

  1. MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY$1.7M
    LEXINGTON, MA · 30 subawards · Scientific research and development services

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 14 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. FURNITURE SOLUTIONS FOR THE WORKPLACE LLC$5.6M−96% in FY2026
    CINCINNATI, OH · 46% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Office furniture (including fixtures) manufacturing
  2. CARITHERS-WALLACE-COURTENAY, LLC$3.6M−92% in FY2026
    ATLANTA, GA · 37% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Office furniture (including fixtures) manufacturingCenters for Disease Control and Prevention · Office furniture (including fixtures) manufacturing
  3. BLUE SKIES FURNITURE LLC$6.8M−100% in FY2026
    COLORADO SPRINGS, CO · 46% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Office furniture (including fixtures) manufacturing

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026.