Federal contractor · HAMMOND, IN

TRIBOLOGIK CORP

TRIBOLOGIK CORP received $9,814 in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 4 awards (−99% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $7.4M. Its largest customer was Bureau of Reclamation ($9,814).

Obligations · FY2026
$9,814
New awards
4
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
51%
UEI
ZM2WA21VJNA3
Small business
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 231.5KFY2017
  2. 657KFY2018
  3. 605.3KFY2019
  4. 337.2KFY2020
  5. 316.1KFY2021
  6. 99.9KFY2022
  7. 2MFY2023
  8. 1.7MFY2024
  9. 1.4MFY2025
  10. 9.8KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Bureau of Reclamation$9,814100%
    4 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Professional services$9,814100%

Where the work was performed

  1. Clark County, NV$5,06652%
  2. Lake County, IN$4,74848%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition51%
    US 39% · $5,000
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions51%
    US 8.7% · $5,000
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. TASK ORDER #2$10.3K
    Bureau of Reclamation· Lake County, IN· Professional services· Dec 30, 2025 – Dec 30, 2025· 140R1726F0001
  2. EO 14398 TRANSFORMER OIL TESTING$5,000
    Bureau of Reclamation· Clark County, NV· Professional services· Jul 31, 2026 – Jul 31, 2026· 140R3026F0065
  3. TRANSFORMER OIL TESTING - BPA CALL NO.2$4,916
    Bureau of Reclamation· Clark County, NV· Professional services· Jun 27, 2025 – Aug 20, 2026· 140R3025F0042
  4. LUBE OIL SAMPLE ANALYSIS FOR 2025$4,478
    Bureau of Reclamation· Lake County, IN· Professional services· Feb 3, 2025 – May 26, 2026· 140R1725F0002

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 3 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS RESEARCH CORP$3.4M+51% in FY2026
    CLAREMONT, CA · 99.7% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. ALLIANCE CONSULTING GROUP, INC.$3.9M−28% in FY2026
    ALEXANDRIA, VA · 99.7% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. THE ORYZA GROUP LLC$4.1M−41% in FY2026
    DOUGLASVILLE, GA · 99.7% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.