Federal contractor · PLYMOUTH, MI

TRIMER TECHNOLOGIES LLC

TRIMER TECHNOLOGIES LLC received $50K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 2 awards (−90% vs FY2025). Since FY2019: $7.3M. Its largest customer was Department of the Air Force ($50K).

Obligations · FY2026
$50K
New awards
2
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
TDFBJU8XQM69
Small business
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 233KFY2019
  2. 234.5KFY2020
  3. 890.9KFY2021
  4. 1.2MFY2022
  5. 2.4MFY2023
  6. 1.8MFY2024
  7. 500KFY2025
  8. 50KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Department of the Air Force$50K100%
    1 awards
  2. Department of the Navy$00.0%
    1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Research & development$50K100%

Where the work was performed

  1. Wayne County, MI$50K100%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition0.0%
    US 39% · $0
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.8% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT$1M
    Department of the Navy· Wayne County, MI· Research & development· Sep 3, 2024 – Oct 22, 2025· N6833524C0412
  2. AFFORDABLE THERMAL PROTECTION MATERIALS$50K
    Department of the Air Force· Wayne County, MI· Research & development· Jun 4, 2026 – Jun 4, 2026· FA230426C0003

Federal grants & assistance received

Grants, loans (counted at their subsidy cost), direct payments and insurance, by fiscal year of the action (USAspending.gov, FABS). Reported apart from contracts and never added to them.

TRIMER TECHNOLOGIES LLC received $0 in federal assistance in FY2026, on 0 actions (0 new awards).

Assistance · FY2026
$0
New awards
0
Actions
0
Since FY2021
$200K

Assistance by fiscal year

  1. 0FY2021
  2. 0FY2022
  3. 0FY2023
  4. 200KFY2024
  5. 0FY2025

Source: Federal financial assistance transactions (Financial Assistance Broker Submission) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · FY2021–FY2025.

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

1 company · $150K reported

  1. EATON CORPORATION$150K
    RALEIGH, NC · 1 subaward · Scientific research and development services

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 2 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. STRIKE DEFENSE SYSTEMS, INC.$2.2M−100% in FY2026
    ALLEN, TX · 97% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Scientific research and development services
  2. SCIX3 LLC$2.2M+684% in FY2026
    ALEXANDRIA, VA · 97% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Scientific research and development services
  3. BINERA, INC.$2.2M
    ROCKVILLE, MD · 97% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Scientific research and development services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026.