Federal contractor · NORTH HIGHLANDS, CA

TSI ENGINEERING, INC.

TSI ENGINEERING, INC. received $13.9K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 1 awards (−99% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $24.2M. Its largest customer was Federal Highway Administration ($13.9K).

Obligations · FY2026
$13.9K
New awards
1
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
L8XQFHGQJRB4
Small businessMinority-owned8(a) programHUBZone firm
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 2.2MFY2017
  2. 3.8MFY2018
  3. -125.7KFY2019
  4. 484.5KFY2020
  5. 4.7MFY2021
  6. 1.1MFY2022
  7. 8MFY2023
  8. 1.7MFY2024
  9. 2.5MFY2025
  10. 13.9KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Federal Highway Administration$13.9K100%
    1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Construction & real property$13.9K100%

Where the work was performed

  1. San Francisco County, CA$13.9K100%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition0.0%
    US 39% · $0
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.8% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. CA NP GOGA 469(1) CHINA BEACH ACCESS ROAD 6982AF23C000023 OBLIGATE FUNDS FOR CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT FUNDED BY IAA SCOPE INCLUDES PARKING LOT, DRAINAGE, RETAINING WALL, TRAIL CONSTRUCTION AND UTILITIES$8.6M
    Federal Highway Administration· San Francisco County, CA· Construction & real property· Apr 4, 2023 – Mar 6, 2026· 6982AF23C000023

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 3 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. CAON F.LLI DI CAON ELIO & C. S.N.C.$2.7M−13% in FY2026
    RESANA, ITA · 64% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Building finishing contractors
  2. RIM ENGINEERING CO., LTD.$3.3M−100% in FY2026
    URASOE-SHI, JPN · 68% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Building finishing contractors
  3. ASJ CONSTRUCTION, A TEXAS LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY$2.3M+2.4% in FY2026
    LAMPASAS, TX · 55% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Building finishing contractors

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026.