Federal contractor · TULSA, OK

TULSA DENTAL PRODUCTS LLC

TULSA DENTAL PRODUCTS LLC received -$23.5K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 5 awards (−646% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $18.8M. Its largest customer was Defense Logistics Agency (-$527).

Obligations · FY2026
-$23.5K
New awards
5
Sole-source
—
Single offer
—
UEI
CKJAMKKQNFP1
Other than small business
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 3MFY2017
  2. 2.9MFY2018
  3. 2.6MFY2019
  4. 2MFY2020
  5. 2.6MFY2021
  6. 2.3MFY2022
  7. 1.9MFY2023
  8. 1.5MFY2024
  9. 4.3KFY2025
  10. -23.5KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Defense Logistics Agency-$5270.0%
    3 awards
  2. Indian Health Service-$23K0.0%
    2 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

Largest awards

  1. BPA FOR MEDICAL DENTAL SUPPLIES FOR THC DENTAL DEPARTMENT ON AS NEEDED BASIS - DATES OF PERFORMANCE 02/21/2022 THRU 02/20/2023$8,619
    Indian Health Service· McKinley County, NM· Health & medical· Feb 18, 2022 – Jul 22, 2026· 75H71022F80262
  2. BPA - TO PROCURE VARIOUS DENTAL SUPPLIES FOR THE DENTAL DEPT. AT NNMC.$6,380
    Indian Health Service· San Juan County, NM· Health & medical· Mar 31, 2020 – Jul 29, 2026· 75H71020F80754
  3. 8508061807!FILE SET,ENDODONTIC$0
    Defense Logistics Agency· Tulsa County, OK· Health & medical· Mar 16, 2021 – Nov 6, 2025· SPE2DH21P1359
  4. 8508042816!FILE SET,ENDODONTIC$0
    Defense Logistics Agency· Tulsa County, OK· Health & medical· Mar 8, 2021 – Nov 6, 2025· SPE2DH21P1276
  5. 8507470077!POINT,ENDODONTIC$0
    Defense Logistics Agency· Tulsa County, OK· Health & medical· Jun 16, 2020 – Nov 6, 2025· SPE2DH20P1822

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 1 market (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. SIMULAB CORPORATION$1.6M−61% in FY2026
    TUKWILA, WA · 95% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveDefense Logistics Agency · Professional and commercial equipment and supplies merchant wholesalers
  2. ENOVA ILLUMINATION, INC.$1.5M−49% in FY2026
    MINNEAPOLIS, MN · 2 entities · 88% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveDefense Logistics Agency · Professional and commercial equipment and supplies merchant wholesalers
  3. ALLERGAN, INC.$1.6M−44% in FY2026
    NORTH CHICAGO, IL · 2 entities · 89% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveDefense Logistics Agency · Professional and commercial equipment and supplies merchant wholesalers

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.