Federal contractor · ANCHORAGE, AK

TYONEK GLOBAL SERVICES LLC

TYONEK GLOBAL SERVICES LLC received -$8M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 5 awards (−245% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $382.7M. Its largest customer was Department of the Army ($175K).

Obligations · FY2026
-$8M
New awards
5
Sole-source
—
Single offer
—
UEI
C147PB4NTAK6
Small businessMinority-owned8(a) programNative-owned

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

3 registered entities of the same company or corporate group, -$6.2M in FY2026 together.

  1. TYONEK GLOBAL SERVICES LLCANCHORAGE, AK · Family page
    -$8M
  2. $1.7M
  3. $0

AI-inferred: entity-match@1 · Analisa AI · 2026-09-30

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 8.8MFY2017
  2. 33MFY2018
  3. 33.5MFY2019
  4. 76.9MFY2020
  5. 83MFY2021
  6. 75.5MFY2022
  7. 44.9MFY2023
  8. 29.7MFY2024
  9. 5.5MFY2025
  10. -8MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 1 awards
  2. 4 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Professional services$175K100%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

Largest awards

  1. Department of the Army· Madison County, AL· Professional services· Mar 1, 2023 – Jan 13, 2026· W91CRB23F0087
  2. Department of the Navy· Craven County, NC· Equipment maintenance· Jul 28, 2022 – Feb 4, 2026· N6852022F7023
  3. Department of the Navy· Craven County, NC· Equipment maintenance· Jul 14, 2023 – Feb 23, 2026· N6852023F7003
  4. Department of the Navy· Craven County, NC· Equipment maintenance· Oct 1, 2021 – Feb 4, 2026· N6852022F7002
  5. Department of the Navy· Craven County, NC· Equipment maintenance· Dec 10, 2020 – Jan 16, 2026· N6134021F0024

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $8.6M paid out · $0 received
  • FY2022: $17.1M paid out · $0 received
  • FY2023: $8.2M paid out · $0 received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 8, 2026, loaded Oct 8, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

28 companies · $37.5M reported

  1. COLORADO SPRINGS, CO · 17 subawards · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing
  2. MADISON, AL · 5 subawards · Business schools and computer and management training
  3. MCLEAN, VA · 4 subawards · Business schools and computer and management training

Primes that pay it

No prime reported paying it.

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 8, 2026, loaded Oct 8, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 4 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. MD HELICOPTERS, LLC$19.9M+248% in FY2026
    MESA, AZ · 7 entities · 48% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Support activities for air transportation
  2. DYNAMIC SCIENCE, INC.$18.3M−14% in FY2026
    CHESAPEAKE, VA · 44% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Support activities for air transportation
  3. B3 ENTERPRISES LLC$48.7M−63% in FY2026
    WOODBRIDGE, VA · 66% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Support activities for air transportation

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026.