Federal contractor · MC FARLAND, WI

U.S. VET GENERAL CONTRACTING, LLC

U.S. VET GENERAL CONTRACTING, LLC received $3.8M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 16 awards (−81% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $114.8M. Its largest customer was Department of Veterans Affairs ($3.3M).

Obligations · FY2026
$3.8M
New awards
16
Sole-source
2.7%
Single offer
36%
UEI
T1YMVFYUF2L5
Small businessVeteran-ownedService-disabled veteran-owned

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 16.4MFY2017
  2. 5.7MFY2018
  3. 8.9MFY2019
  4. 3.5MFY2020
  5. 3.2MFY2021
  6. 18.7MFY2022
  7. 23.6MFY2023
  8. 11MFY2024
  9. 19.9MFY2025
  10. 3.8MFY2026
  11. 105.1KFY2027

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 14 awards
  2. 2 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Construction & real property$3.7M97%
  2. Equipment maintenance$100.7K2.7%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition38%
    US 39% · $1.4M
  • Sole-source awards2.7%
    US 30% · $100.7K
  • Single-offer competitions36%
    US 8.7% · $1.3M
  • Urgency justifications5.1%
    US 5.1% · $192.5K

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. Department of Veterans Affairs · 1 awards

Largest awards

  1. Department of Veterans Affairs· Dane County, WI· Construction & real property· Dec 30, 2024 – Oct 5, 2026· 36C25225C0015
  2. Department of Veterans Affairs· Monroe County, WI· Construction & real property· Jun 20, 2023 – Dec 23, 2025· 36C25223C0047
  3. Department of the Army· Dane County, WI· Construction & real property· Aug 8, 2024 – Mar 9, 2026· W50S9F24C0001
  4. Department of Veterans Affairs· Monroe County, WI· Construction & real property· Sep 5, 2025 – Aug 24, 2026· 36C25225C0057
  5. Department of Veterans Affairs· Dane County, WI· Construction & real property· Aug 28, 2024 – Jan 22, 2026· 36C25224N0554
  6. Department of Veterans Affairs· Monroe County, WI· Construction & real property· Mar 6, 2026 – Sep 29, 2026· 36C25226N0309
  7. Department of Veterans Affairs· Milwaukee County, WI· Construction & real property· Aug 16, 2024 – Jul 21, 2026· 36C25224N0521
  8. Department of Veterans Affairs· Dane County, WI· Construction & real property· Sep 10, 2026 – Sep 10, 2026· 36C25226N0577

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

1 company · $460.6K reported

  1. WESTBOROUGH, MA · 2 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 5 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. ARMCORP CONSTRUCTION INC$37.1M−47% in FY2026
    CELINA, OH · 87% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveVeterans Affairs · Nonresidential building constructionArmy · Nonresidential building constructionVeterans Affairs · Building equipment contractors
  2. ROCK CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT LLC$24.7M+5,033% in FY2026
    BLUE SPRINGS, MO · 67% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveVeterans Affairs · Nonresidential building constructionVeterans Affairs · Building equipment contractors
  3. COBURN CONTRACTORS, LLC$22.4M+487% in FY2026
    MILLBROOK, AL · 64% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveVeterans Affairs · Nonresidential building constructionVeterans Affairs · Building equipment contractors

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026.