Federal contractor · TROY, MI

UNIFIED BUSINESS TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

UNIFIED BUSINESS TECHNOLOGIES, INC. received $4.2M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 21 awards (−66% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $157.5M. Its largest customer was Department of the Army ($3.2M).

Obligations · FY2026
$4.2M
New awards
21
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
11%
UEI
G5LHK66N7M25
Small businessWoman-owned
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 10.5MFY2017
  2. 14.6MFY2018
  3. 13.3MFY2019
  4. 25.8MFY2020
  5. 21.2MFY2021
  6. 22MFY2022
  7. 18.2MFY2023
  8. 15.4MFY2024
  9. 12.3MFY2025
  10. 4.2MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Department of the Army$3.2M75%
    4 awards
  2. National Park Service$2.1M49%
    8 awards
  3. U.S. Special Operations Command$1.9M45%
    1 awards
  4. Defense Microelectronics Activity$591.1K14%
    2 awards
  5. Maritime Administration$00.0%
    1 awards
  6. Defense Logistics Agency-$204.7K0.0%
    1 awards
  7. Department of the Navy-$3.3M0.0%
    4 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. IT & telecom$4.2M86%
  2. Other equipment & supplies$446.8K9.1%
  3. Construction & real property$247.9K5.1%

Where the work was performed

  1. Prince George County, VA$2.3M54%
  2. San Diego County, CA$1.9M45%
  3. Oakland County, MI$1.7M39%
  4. District of Columbia, DC$832.7K20%
  5. San Francisco County, CA$469.7K11%
  6. Blanco County, TX$247.9K5.9%
  7. Ventura County, CA$61.8K1.5%
  8. Leavenworth County, KS$39.9K0.9%
  9. Charles County, MD$20.4K0.5%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition11%
    US 39% · $469.7K
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions11%
    US 8.7% · $469.7K
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. NAVFAC MID-ATLANTIC, CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS (CI) SERVICES FOR CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING TECHNICIAN, CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULER, CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT AND ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT SUPPORT. ESTIMATED LEVEL OF EFFORT: 55 FULL-TIME EQUIVALENT POSITIONS.$30.7M
    Department of the Navy· Norfolk city, VA· Professional services· Aug 19, 2019 – Oct 6, 2025· N4008519F3500
  2. CASCOM G-6 IT SUPPORT SERVICES$17.8M
    Department of the Army· Prince George County, VA· IT & telecom· Jan 31, 2023 – Feb 16, 2026· W91QF523F0008
  3. GFEBS REAL PROPERTY FUNCTONAL SUPPORT$7.8M
    Department of the Army· District of Columbia, DC· Professional services· Mar 1, 2022 – Apr 7, 2026· W9124J22F0037
  4. SERVICES$6.6M
    U.S. Special Operations Command· San Diego County, CA· IT & telecom· Sep 30, 2021 – Feb 26, 2026· H9224021F0557
  5. REMOTE ARMING DEVICE FOR MK 104$1.6M
    Department of the Navy· Charles County, MD· Other equipment & supplies· Jul 20, 2022 – Mar 19, 2026· N0017422F0121
  6. LYJO 290111 CMR SERVICES$1M
    National Park Service· Blanco County, TX· Construction & real property· Nov 1, 2023 – Jul 16, 2026· 140P2024F0015
  7. TO FURNISH, INSTALL, TEST, AND DOCUMENT A TURNKEY SOLUTION TO UPGRADE THE EXISTING DATA CENTER AND OSP INFRASTRUCTURE USING GOVERNMENT AND COMMERCIAL STANDARDS AT CAMP FRETTERD, MD.$957.4K
    Department of the Army· Baltimore County, MD· IT & telecom· Jun 20, 2024 – Nov 20, 2025· W91RUS24F0155
  8. GATE 318738 REHAB FORT WADSWORTH WATER, WASTEWATER & STORMWATER UTILITY SYSTEMS (CMR)$907.9K
    National Park Service· Oakland County, MI· Professional services· Dec 17, 2025 – Dec 17, 2025· 140P2026F0033

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $95.6K (1 subaward)

1 prime

  1. BAE SYSTEMS LAND & ARMAMENTS L.P.$95.6K100%
    STERLING HEIGHTS, MI · 1 subaward

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $0 paid out · $264.2K received
  • FY2024: $0 paid out · $187.7K received
  • FY2025: $0 paid out · $41.9K received
  • FY2026: $0 paid out · $95.6K received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

3 companies · $589.5K reported

  1. BAE SYSTEMS LAND & ARMAMENTS L.P.$359.8K
    YORK, PA · 2 subawards · Other transportation equipment manufacturing
  2. ELECTRIC BOAT CORPORATION$187.7K
    GROTON, CT · 1 subaward · Other transportation equipment manufacturing
  3. DCS CORPORATION$41.9K
    ALEXANDRIA, VA · 1 subaward · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 9 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. B&T TECHNOLOGY SERVICES, G.P.$20.1M−92% in FY2026
    HUNTSVILLE, AL · 62% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Computer systems design and related services
  2. INFINITE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.$22.7M+18% in FY2026
    EL DORADO HILLS, CA · 62% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Computer systems design and related servicesAir Force · Computer systems design and related services
  3. CKA, LLC$18.2M−98% in FY2026
    GAITHERSBURG, MD · 57% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Computer systems design and related services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.