Federal contractor · LA JOLLA, CA

UNITED SUPPORT SERVICES, INC.

UNITED SUPPORT SERVICES, INC. received $5M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 3 awards (−55% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $121.2M. Its largest customer was Department of the Navy ($4.9M).

Obligations · FY2026
$5M
New awards
3
Sole-source
3.6%
Single offer
1.4%
UEI
W69MM3ESGPM3
Small businessVeteran-ownedService-disabled veteran-ownedMinority-owned8(a) program

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 4.5MFY2017
  2. 7.8MFY2018
  3. 9.2MFY2019
  4. 16.1MFY2020
  5. 16.4MFY2021
  6. 17.6MFY2022
  7. 19.2MFY2023
  8. 14.1MFY2024
  9. 11.2MFY2025
  10. 5MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 2 awards
  2. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Equipment maintenance$4.8M96%
  2. Professional services$180.6K3.6%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition5.0%
    US 39% · $251.2K
  • Sole-source awards3.6%
    US 30% · $180.6K
  • Single-offer competitions1.4%
    US 8.8% · $70.6K
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. LABOR$53.5M
    Department of the Navy· San Diego County, CA· Equipment maintenance· Dec 30, 2020 – Apr 9, 2026· N0024421C0003
  2. Department of the Navy· San Diego County, CA· Professional services· Dec 29, 2020 – Dec 29, 2025· N0024421C0008
  3. U.S. Coast Guard· District of Columbia, DC· Equipment maintenance· Aug 5, 2026 – Aug 5, 2026· 70Z0G726FCGRC0006

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $64.1K (1 subaward)

1 sub-recipient

  1. AES SYSTEMS INC$64.1K100%
    SPRINGVILLE, UT · 1 subaward

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

Its reported sub-contracts equal 1.3% of its FY2026 contract obligations.

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $0 paid out · $17.9M received
  • FY2022: $0 paid out · $436.9K received
  • FY2023: $0 paid out · $115.1K received
  • FY2024: $0 paid out · $491K received
  • FY2025: $0 paid out · $140.1K received
  • FY2026: $64.1K paid out · $0 received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

1 company · $64.1K reported

  1. SPRINGVILLE, UT · 1 subaward · Facilities support services

Primes that pay it

3 companies · $19.1M reported

  1. HOUSTON, TX · 1 subaward · Computer systems design and related services
  2. PASCAGOULA, MS · 13 subawards · Ship and boat building
  3. RESTON, VA · 6 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 9 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. SHINKO CO.,LTD.$28.4M−7% in FY2026
    SASEBO-SHI, JPN · 89% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Ship and boat buildingNavy · Services to buildings and dwellings
  2. GENOVA, ITA · 85% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Ship and boat building
  3. EVERETT SHIP REPAIR, LLC$24.8M−100% in FY2026
    FREELAND, WA · 82% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Ship and boat building

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026.