Federal contractor · SAINT PAUL

UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA

No contract obligations recorded for UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA in FY2026. Since FY2017: $8.1M.

Obligations · FY2026
$0
New awards
0
Sole-source
—
Single offer
—
UEI
D7VCKYC47XF3
Other than small businessEducational institution

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

Part of the UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA PHYSICIANS company family: 2 registered entities, $3.5M in FY2026 together. See the family

  1. UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA PHYSICIANSMINNEAPOLIS, MN · Family page
    $3.5M

AI-inferred: entity-match@1 · Analisa AI · 2026-09-29

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 1MFY2017
  2. 913.6KFY2018
  3. 1.1MFY2019
  4. 1.1MFY2020
  5. 1.2MFY2021
  6. 1.1MFY2022
  7. 812.7KFY2023
  8. 811.2KFY2024
  9. -2.4KFY2025

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

No contract obligations recorded for UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA in FY2026.

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

1 company · $650.1K reported

  1. BOWLING GREEN, KY · 6 subawards · Technical and trade schools

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 5 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. PITTSBURGH, PA · 2 entities · 76% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveVeterans Affairs · Colleges, universities, and professional schools
  2. UNMC PHYSICIANS$9.7M+67% in FY2026
    OMAHA, NE · 69% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveVeterans Affairs · Colleges, universities, and professional schoolsVeterans Affairs · Offices of physicians
  3. BUFFALO, NY · 76% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveVeterans Affairs · Colleges, universities, and professional schools

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Across the company family of UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA PHYSICIANS (2 recipients).

Matched organizations

  • UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTAAI match · 100%
Lobbying · 2025
$240K
11 reports
Lobbying · 2023–2026
$872K
$872K in its own reports

Lobbying by year

  1. 2023$222K
    12 reports
  2. 2024$290K
    12 reports
  3. 2025$240K
    11 reports
  4. 2026$120K
    6 reports

Top issues

  1. Budget and appropriations35 reports
  2. Agriculture24 reports
  3. Health issues13 reports
  4. Defense12 reports
  5. Education10 reports
  6. Medicare and Medicaid10 reports
  7. Sports and athletics7 reports
  8. Natural resources2 reports

Who was contacted

  1. U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES35 reports
  2. U.S. SENATE35 reports

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

  1. Lewis-Burke Associates, LLC$460K
    10 reports
  2. Cornerstone Government Affairs, Inc.$280K
    14 reports
  3. Cozen O'Connor Public Strategies$120K
    3 reports

Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: Analisa AI name judgments (entity-match@1), updated Oct 5, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026.