Federal contractor · HOUSTON, TX

UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER AT HOUSTON, THE

UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER AT HOUSTON, THE received -$5,042 in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 3 awards (−102% vs FY2025). Since FY2020: $2.5M. Its largest customer was Department of the Navy (-$5,042).

Obligations · FY2026
-$5,042
New awards
3
Sole-source
—
Single offer
—
UEI
QN8KZSQMCJH6
Other than small businessEducational institutionGovernment entity

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

Part of the UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN company family: 15 registered entities, $101.7M in FY2026 together. See the family

  1. UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTINAUSTIN, TX · Family page
    $80M
  2. $10.3M
  3. $8.7M
  4. $1.6M
  5. $606K

AI-inferred: entity-match@1 · Analisa AI · 2026-10-05

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 389.3KFY2020
  2. 540.9KFY2021
  3. 530.8KFY2022
  4. 520.8KFY2023
  5. 232.5KFY2024
  6. 276.1KFY2025
  7. -5KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 3 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. Department of Defense · 2 awards

Largest awards

  1. Department of the Navy· Harris County, TX· Education & social services· Apr 10, 2025 – Mar 26, 2026· N0622A25FA216
  2. Department of the Navy· Harris County, TX· Education & social services· Mar 5, 2026 – Mar 5, 2026· N0622A26FA187
  3. Department of the Navy· Harris County, TX· Education & social services· Jun 3, 2026 – Jun 3, 2026· N0622A26FA447

Federal grants & assistance received

Grants, loans (counted at their subsidy cost), direct payments and insurance, by fiscal year of the action (USAspending.gov, FABS). Reported apart from contracts and never added to them.

UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER AT HOUSTON, THE received $0 in federal assistance in FY2026, on 0 actions (0 new awards).

Assistance · FY2026
$0
New awards
0
Actions
0
Since FY2024
$0

Assistance by fiscal year

  1. 265KFY2024
  2. -265KFY2025

Source: Federal financial assistance transactions (Financial Assistance Broker Submission) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 8, 2026, loaded Oct 8, 2026 · FY2024–FY2025.

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-grants: $115.4K (1 subaward)

1 prime

  1. PITTSBURGH, PA · 1 subaward

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $0 paid out · $12.2K received
  • FY2022: $0 paid out · $3.6M received
  • FY2023: $0 paid out · $321.7K received
  • FY2024: $0 paid out · $1.6M received
  • FY2025: $0 paid out · $114.9K received
  • FY2026: $0 paid out · $115.4K received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

654 companies · $1.1B reported

  1. CHICAGO, IL · 1 subaward
  2. HOUSTON, TX · 87 subawards
  3. LA JOLLA, CA · 45 subawards

Primes that pay it

338 companies · $1.1B reported

  1. HEALTH & HUMAN SVC COMMN TX$340.2M
    AUSTIN, TX · 178 subawards
  2. HOUSTON, TX · 106 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. AUSTIN, TX · 29 subawards

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 46 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. CALIFORNIA, MD · 68% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Scientific research and development servicesArmy · Scientific research and development services
  2. INNOVATIVE DEFENSE TECHNOLOGIES, LLC$343.9M−5.9% in FY2026
    ARLINGTON, VA · 64% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Scientific research and development services
  3. UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON$272M−44% in FY2026
    SEATTLE, WA · 14 entities · 51% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Scientific research and development servicesNational Institutes of Health · Scientific research and development servicesDefense Advanced Research Projects Agency · Scientific research and development services+3 more

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Across the company family of UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN (15 recipients).

Matched organizations

  • The University of Texas at AustinAI match · 100%
  • The University of Texas at San AntonioAI match · 100%
  • The University of Texas SystemAI match · 100%
  • University of Texas AustinAI match · 100%
  • University of Texas Health Science CenterAI match · 97%
Lobbying · 2025
$950K
24 reports
Lobbying · 2023–2026
$3M
$3M in its own reports

Lobbying by year

  1. 2023$826K
    19 reports
  2. 2024$1M
    21 reports
  3. 2025$950K
    24 reports
  4. 2026$220K
    11 reports

Top issues

  1. Science and technology50 reports
  2. Budget and appropriations45 reports
  3. Defense41 reports
  4. Education38 reports
  5. Medical and disease research, clinical labs22 reports
  6. Health issues19 reports
  7. Sports and athletics16 reports
  8. Real estate, land use and conservation11 reports

Who was contacted

  1. U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES71 reports
  2. U.S. SENATE71 reports

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

  1. Cornerstone Government Affairs, Inc.$2.1M
    34 reports
  2. WASHINGTON NAVIGATORS$660K
    14 reports

Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: Analisa AI name judgments (entity-match@1), updated Oct 5, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.