Federal contractor · KING OF PRUSSIA, PA

UPL NA INC

No contract obligations recorded for UPL NA INC in FY2026. Since FY2017: $1.8M.

Obligations · FY2026: $0
New awards: 0
Sole-source: —
Single offer: —

UEI: G8YGGR7AENB9
Parent company: UPL CORPORATION LIMITED

Other than small business

Open in the contracts explorer Relationship graph

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

186KFY2017
235.7KFY2018
329KFY2019
241.8KFY2020
129.4KFY2022
326.6KFY2023
362.8KFY2024

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

No contract obligations recorded for UPL NA INC in FY2026.

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 1 market (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

VALIOSA LLC$1.2M−62% in FY2026
ADA, OK · 100% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveBureau of Indian Affairs and Bureau of Indian Education · Pesticide, fertilizer, and other agricultural chemical manufacturing
CLEARCHANNELVM, LLC$1.7M−13% in FY2026
MISSOULA, MT · 100% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveBureau of Indian Affairs and Bureau of Indian Education · Pesticide, fertilizer, and other agricultural chemical manufacturing
RLH INC.$4.2M−78% in FY2026
MISSION, SD · 27% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveBureau of Indian Affairs and Bureau of Indian Education · Pesticide, fertilizer, and other agricultural chemical manufacturing

Showing the top 3 of 7 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Matched organizations

UPL NA INC.AI match · 97%

Lobbying · 2025: $430K; 8 reports
Lobbying · 2023–2026: $1.2M; $810K in its own reports
PAC giving · 2026: $6,000; 1 PAC

Lobbying by year

2023$240K
4 reports
2024$240K
6 reports
2025$430K
8 reports
2026$260K
6 reports

Top issues

Agriculture24 reports
Chemicals and chemical industry8 reports
Trade (domestic and foreign)6 reports
Taxation and the Internal Revenue Code2 reports

Who was contacted

Agriculture - Dept of (USDA)20 reports
U.S. SENATE16 reports
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)15 reports
U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES14 reports
U.S. Trade Representative (USTR)11 reports
Natl Economic Council (NEC)5 reports
State - Dept of (DOS)5 reports
U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID)5 reports
White House Office5 reports
Commerce - Dept of (DOC)4 reports

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

The Russell Group, Inc.$840K
14 reports
KING AND CO$0
2 reports

Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

PAC giving to candidates by party, 2026 cycle

Democratic$4,00067%
Republican$2,00033%

PACs sponsored

UPL NA INC. POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE (AKA UPL PAC)$29.3K raised this cycle

PACs these organizations sponsor (connected organizations in FEC records). A PAC gives employees' and members' voluntary contributions, not the company's own money.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: Analisa AI name judgments (entity-match@1), updated Sep 30, 2026.

Congress: members and bills

Through the organizations matched to this company: members of Congress whose campaigns received contributions from their PACs, and the bills their lobbying reports named. Shown beside the company's contracts as a comparison, not a cause.

Members whose campaigns received from its PACs, 2026 cycle

Adam Gray$2,500
D-CA-13 · House · 1 PAC
Nikki Budzinski$1,500
D-IL-13 · House · 1 PAC
Vince Fong$1,000
R-CA-20 · House · 1 PAC

$5,000 of the $6,000 its PACs gave to federal candidates went to 3 members of Congress.

Direct and in-kind contributions the members' campaigns received (FEC), net of refunds. Party and seat are the member's current or latest.

Bills named in its lobbying reports

S. 2603 · Streamlining Conservation Practice Standards Act of 20233 reports
118th Congress · Introduced · 2023–2024
H.R. 1 · An act to provide for reconciliation pursuant to title II of H. Con. Res. 14.1 report
119th Congress · Became law · 2025

4 of 24 reports (2023–2026) name at least one bill. Bills and resolutions the current reports name in their issue descriptions, by number of reports. A report names what it lobbied on, not which side it took.

Amounts, members and bills are as recorded, shown side by side. They say nothing about why a contribution was made, how a member voted or what a report sought. A bill number written in a report is read as the measure of the Congress its context points to (a law's number, the Congress written next to it, the title), else of the Congress then sitting.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.