Federal contractor · SOMERVILLE, MA

UPSTREAM TECH INC

UPSTREAM TECH INC received $635K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 1 awards (−40% vs FY2025). Since FY2024: $2.1M. Its largest customer was Office of the Chief Financial Officer ($635K).

Obligations · FY2026
$635K
New awards
1
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
V3ZGBM1ML7L9
Small businessWoman-owned
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 370KFY2024
  2. 1.1MFY2025
  3. 635KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Office of the Chief Financial Officer$635K100%
    1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Professional services$635K100%

Where the work was performed

  1. Middlesex County, MA$635K100%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition0.0%
    US 39% · $0
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.8% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. LAND EASEMENT CHANGE DETECTION NATURAL RESOURCE CONSERVATION SERVICES$635K
    Office of the Chief Financial Officer· Middlesex County, MA· Professional services· Sep 25, 2026 – Sep 25, 2026· 12314426C0045

Federal grants & assistance received

Grants, loans (counted at their subsidy cost), direct payments and insurance, by fiscal year of the action (USAspending.gov, FABS). Reported apart from contracts and never added to them.

UPSTREAM TECH INC received $0 in federal assistance in FY2026, on 0 actions (0 new awards).

Assistance · FY2026
$0
New awards
0
Actions
0
Since FY2021
$931.7K

Assistance by fiscal year

  1. 1.1MFY2021
  2. 0FY2022
  3. -157.3KFY2024

Source: Federal financial assistance transactions (Financial Assistance Broker Submission) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · FY2021–FY2024.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 3 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. EDWARD PETERSEN$740.8K−1.4% in FY2026
    NYSSA, OR · 36% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveUnder Secretary for Farm and Foreign Agricultural Services · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services
  2. AGRILOGIC CONSULTING, LLC$789.2K
    BRYAN, TX · 36% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveUnder Secretary for Farm and Foreign Agricultural Services · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services
  3. ROCK LEAF WATER ENVIRONMENTAL LLC$789.7K+50% in FY2026
    BLAINE, MN · 36% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveUnder Secretary for Farm and Foreign Agricultural Services · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026.