Federal contractor · HUNTSVILLE, AL

VALI, INC.

VALI, INC. received $363K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 4 awards (−89% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $14.2M. Its largest customer was Department of the Army ($362K).

Obligations · FY2026
$363K
New awards
4
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
NL2ZPHGJHBC5
Small businessVeteran-ownedService-disabled veteran-owned

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

2 registered entities of the same company or corporate group, $363K in FY2026 together.

  1. VALI, INC.HUNTSVILLE, AL · Family page
    $363K
  2. VALI INCBROWNSBORO, AL
    $0

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 269.2KFY2017
  2. 104.6KFY2018
  3. 500FY2019
  4. 840.2KFY2020
  5. 841.1KFY2021
  6. 3MFY2022
  7. 2.2MFY2023
  8. 3.2MFY2024
  9. 3.4MFY2025
  10. 363KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 2 awards
  2. 1 awards
  3. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Professional services$273.8K75%
  2. Equipment maintenance$88.7K24%
  3. Research & development$5000.1%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition0.0%
    US 39% · $0
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.8% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. Department of the Army· Monroe County, PA· Professional services· Apr 1, 2022 – Apr 3, 2026· W25G1V22F0157
  2. Department of the Army· Madison County, AL· Equipment maintenance· Aug 15, 2024 – Feb 12, 2026· W58RGZ24F0153
  3. Missile Defense Agency· Madison County, AL· Research & development· Dec 19, 2025 – Jun 4, 2026· HQ085926FF359
  4. Department of the Air Force· Madison County, AL· Equipment maintenance· Jan 26, 2026 – Jan 26, 2026· FA810826FB022

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $0 paid out · $691.7K received
  • FY2022: $0 paid out · $964.3K received
  • FY2023: $0 paid out · $1.4M received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

2 companies · $3M reported

  1. HOUSTON, TX · 7 subawards · Facilities support services
  2. COLORADO SPRINGS, CO · 1 subaward · Facilities support services

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 4 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. OPTIMAL GEO, LLC$4.1M−100% in FY2026
    ATHENS, AL · 59% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. COLORADO SPRINGS, CO · 59% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. PRYZM CONSULTING LLC$4.2M−96% in FY2026
    HONOLULU, HI · 59% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026.