Federal contractor · PORTLAND, OR

VANTAGE POINT CONSULTING INC.

VANTAGE POINT CONSULTING INC. received $2.2M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 5 awards (+97% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $12.2M. Its largest customer was Defense Human Resources Activity ($1.4M).

Obligations · FY2026
$2.2M
New awards
5
Sole-source
2.0%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
EFMJMBBKTH98
Parent company
VANTAGE POINT CONSULTING INC
Small businessWoman-ownedVeteran-ownedMinority-owned

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 190.5KFY2017
  2. 196.2KFY2018
  3. 402KFY2019
  4. 1.3MFY2020
  5. 760.6KFY2021
  6. 2MFY2022
  7. 2.2MFY2023
  8. 1.7MFY2024
  9. 1.1MFY2025
  10. 2.2MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 2 awards
  2. 1 awards
  3. 1 awards
  4. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Education & social services$1.7M78%
  2. Professional services$485.2K22%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition2.0%
    US 39% · $43.8K
  • Sole-source awards2.0%
    US 30% · $43.8K
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.7% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. Defense Human Resources Activity· Alexandria city, VA· IT & telecom· Jul 8, 2022 – Mar 6, 2026· H9821022F0205
  2. Defense Human Resources Activity· Multnomah County, OR· Education & social services· Jun 12, 2026 – Jun 12, 2026· H9821026CE005
  3. Department of the Army· Leavenworth County, KS· Professional services· Feb 26, 2025 – Feb 17, 2026· W9124D25F0119
  4. Federal Acquisition Service· Philadelphia County, PA· Education & social services· Sep 29, 2025 – Mar 26, 2026· 47QACA25F0361
  5. Smithsonian Institution· District of Columbia, DC· Education & social services· Sep 24, 2025 – Aug 31, 2026· 33330225CF0010454

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $1.1M (5 subawards)

1 prime

  1. BETHESDA, MD · 5 subawards

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $0 paid out · $666.3K received
  • FY2022: $0 paid out · $666.3K received
  • FY2023: $0 paid out · $654.7K received
  • FY2024: $0 paid out · $1.6M received
  • FY2025: $0 paid out · $1.9M received
  • FY2026: $0 paid out · $1.1M received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

1 company · $6.6M reported

  1. BETHESDA, MD · 13 subawards · Computer systems design and related services

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 9 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. OLAV & CO., INC.$940.1K+218% in FY2026
    HOPKINTON, MA · 18% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Computer systems design and related services
  2. PETERSON'S, LLC$4.8M+42% in FY2026
    DENVER, CO · 29% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveDefense Human Resources Activity · Other schools and instruction
  3. PERSISTENT SENTINEL LLC$1.1M+32% in FY2026
    OMAHA, NE · 18% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Computer systems design and related services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.