Federal contractor · DE QUEEN, AR

VEGETATION MANAGEMENT SERVICES LLC

VEGETATION MANAGEMENT SERVICES LLC received $278.3K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 5 awards (+0.3% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $5.9M. Its largest customer was U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service ($265.9K).

Obligations · FY2026
$278.3K
New awards
5
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
FXCLX9TNEJ63
Parent company
VEGETATION MANAGEMENT SERVICES LLC
Small businessWoman-ownedVeteran-ownedHUBZone firmNative-owned

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 180.1KFY2017
  2. 112KFY2018
  3. 653.7KFY2019
  4. -9.2KFY2020
  5. 236.4KFY2021
  6. 1.7MFY2022
  7. 1.2MFY2023
  8. 1.3MFY2024
  9. 277.5KFY2025
  10. 278.3KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 2 awards
  2. 1 awards
  3. 2 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Facilities & utilities$278.3K100%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition0.0%
    US 39% · $0
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.7% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service· Pointe Coupee Parish, LA· Facilities & utilities· Sep 23, 2026 – Sep 23, 2026· 140FS326C0020
  2. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service· Comanche County, OK· Facilities & utilities· Sep 13, 2024 – Jun 1, 2026· 140FS224P0392
  3. Bureau of Land Management· Montezuma County, CO· Facilities & utilities· Jul 6, 2026 – Jul 6, 2026· 140L3726P0065
  4. Department of the Army· Little River County, AR· Facilities & utilities· Mar 27, 2026 – Mar 27, 2026· W9127S26FA058
  5. Bureau of Land Management· Rio Blanco County, CO· Facilities & utilities· Apr 16, 2024 – Jun 3, 2026· 140L3724P0031

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 6 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. WEST SAINT PAUL, MN · 74% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveU.S. Fish and Wildlife Service · Support activities for forestryForest Service · Support activities for forestry
  2. COMSTOCK SEED LLC$1.3M−100% in FY2026
    GARDNERVILLE, NV · 66% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveU.S. Fish and Wildlife Service · Support activities for forestryForest Service · Support activities for forestry
  3. WILDLIFE SOLUTIONS, INC$989.7K−87% in FY2026
    FAIRHOPE, AL · 53% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveU.S. Fish and Wildlife Service · Support activities for forestryForest Service · Support activities for forestry

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.