Federal contractor · WATERBURY, VT

VERDE TECHNOLOGIES INCORPORATED

VERDE TECHNOLOGIES INCORPORATED received $250K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 1 awards. Its largest customer was Department of the Army ($250K). It also received $305K in federal grants and other assistance in FY2026.

Obligations · FY2026
$250K
New awards
1
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
YNNEUBPBKLM7
Small business

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 250KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Research & development$250K100%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition0.0%
    US 39% · $0
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.8% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. Department of the Army· Washington County, VT· Research & development· Mar 20, 2026 – Mar 26, 2026· W5170126CA145

Federal grants & assistance received

Grants, loans (counted at their subsidy cost), direct payments and insurance, by fiscal year of the action (USAspending.gov, FABS). Reported apart from contracts and never added to them.

VERDE TECHNOLOGIES INCORPORATED received $305K in federal assistance in FY2026, on 1 actions (1 new awards). Its largest program was 47.084 · Technology, Innovation, and Partnerships ($305K).

Assistance · FY2026
$305K
New awards
1
Actions
1

Assistance by fiscal year

  1. 305KFY2026

By type

  1. Grants$305K100%

Top programs

  1. 47.084 · Technology, Innovation, and Partnerships$305K100%

Awarding agencies

Largest awards

  1. 47.084 · Technology, Innovation, and Partnerships· National Science Foundation· Project grant· Aug 13, 2026 – Aug 13, 2026· 2528317

Source: Federal financial assistance transactions (Financial Assistance Broker Submission) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026 · FY2026.

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-grants: $158K (1 subaward)

1 prime

  1. BURLINGTON, VT · 1 subaward

By fiscal year

  • FY2024: $0 paid out · $120K received
  • FY2025: $0 paid out · $200K received
  • FY2026: $0 paid out · $158K received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

2 companies · $478K reported

  1. LEXINGTON, MA · 2 subawards
  2. BURLINGTON, VT · 1 subaward

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 1 market (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. BALTIMORE, MD · 100% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Scientific research and development services
  2. GOLETA, CA · 100% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Scientific research and development services
  3. PAEONIAN SPRINGS, VA · 100% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Scientific research and development services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026.