Federal contractor · COEUR D ALENE, ID
VERDIS TAKISAKI II
VERDIS TAKISAKI II received $1.8M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 5 awards (−15% vs FY2025). Since FY2024: $6.6M. Its largest customer was Department of the Air Force ($1.8M).
- Obligations · FY2026
- $1.8M
- New awards
- 5
- Sole-source
- 0.0%
- Single offer
- 0.0%
- UEI
- HWN2APWU4NF7
Company family
Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.
Part of the VERDIS - TAKISAKI company family: 2 registered entities, $1.8M in FY2026 together. See the family
- VERDIS - TAKISAKICOEUR D ALENE, ID · Family page$0
AI-inferred: entity-match@1 · Analisa AI · 2026-09-30
Spending by fiscal year
Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).
- 2.7MFY2024
- 2.1MFY2025
- 1.8MFY2026
Top buying agencies
Obligations in FY2026.
- Department of the Air Force$1.8M100%5 awards
What was bought · Where the work was performed
Obligations in FY2026.
What was bought
- Construction & real property$1.8M100%
Where the work was performed
- Spokane County, WA$1.8M100%
Integrity signals
Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.
- Low competition0.0%US 39% · $0
- Sole-source awards0.0%US 30% · $0
- Single-offer competitions0.0%US 8.7% · $0
- Urgency justifications0.0%US 5.1% · $0
A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.
Largest awards
- Department of the Air Force· Spokane County, WA· Construction & real property· Sep 30, 2025 – Apr 13, 2026· FA462025F0067
- Department of the Air Force· Spokane County, WA· Construction & real property· Dec 18, 2025 – Dec 18, 2025· FA462026F0027
- Department of the Air Force· Spokane County, WA· Construction & real property· Mar 18, 2026 – Mar 18, 2026· FA462026F0038
- Department of the Air Force· Spokane County, WA· Construction & real property· Dec 19, 2025 – Dec 19, 2025· FA462026F0028
- Department of the Air Force· Spokane County, WA· Construction & real property· Aug 1, 2025 – Nov 21, 2025· FA462025F0054
Competitors
Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.
Compared on 1 market (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.
- SANKYO DENKI OHNA DENKEN JV$7.9M+1,580,139% in FY2026NAHA, JPN · 100% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Nonresidential building construction
- RDZ CONTRACTORS, INC.$7.6M−101% in FY2026NIPOMO, CA · 96% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Nonresidential building construction
- BISMARK CONSTRUCTION CORP$8.5M−52% in FY2026NEWARK, NJ · 100% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Nonresidential building construction
Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.
Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.
Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.
Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.