Federal contractor · CORAL SPRINGS, FL

VERIFONE SYSTEMS, INC.

VERIFONE SYSTEMS, INC. received $10.1K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 1 awards (+36% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $598.2K. Its largest customer was Department of the Army ($10.1K).

Obligations · FY2026
$10.1K
New awards
1
Sole-source
100%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
F5TZM81L1KH9
Other than small business
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 20.8KFY2017
  2. 26.2KFY2018
  3. 13.7KFY2019
  4. 16.1KFY2020
  5. 205.1KFY2021
  6. -8.5KFY2022
  7. 11.3KFY2023
  8. 295.7KFY2024
  9. 7.4KFY2025
  10. 10.1KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Department of the Army$10.1K100%
    1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. IT & telecom$10.1K100%

Where the work was performed

  1. Prince George County, VA$10.1K100%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition100%
    US 39% · $10.1K
  • Sole-source awards100%
    US 30% · $10.1K
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.7% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. VERIFONE CC ANNUAL MAINTENANCE SERVICES$250.8K
    Department of the Army· Prince George County, VA· IT & telecom· Jul 11, 2024 – Mar 31, 2026· W91QF524C0008

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 2 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. SIMAUTHOR, INC.$366K0% in FY2026
    HUNTSVILLE, AL · 95% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Computer systems design and related services
  2. MALLORY ENGINEERING, INC.$433.1K−81% in FY2026
    WOODS CROSS, UT · 95% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Computer systems design and related services
  3. SUCCESS BY DESIGN LLC$459.1K−100% in FY2026
    LAUREL, MD · 95% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Computer systems design and related services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Matched organizations

  • VeriFone, Inc.AI match · 91%
Lobbying · 2026
$240K
2 reports
Lobbying · 2025–2026
$580K

Lobbying by year

  1. 2025$340K
    3 reports
  2. 2026$240K
    2 reports

Top issues

  1. Miscellaneous tariff bills5 reports

Who was contacted

  1. Executive Office of the President (EOP)5 reports
  2. State - Dept of (DOS)5 reports
  3. U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES5 reports
  4. U.S. SENATE5 reports
  5. Commerce - Dept of (DOC)3 reports

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

  1. The Madison Group$580K
    5 reports

Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: Analisa AI name judgments (entity-match@1), updated Sep 30, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.